The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC)[1] was a unique learning and accountability initiative in the relief and development sector. It was first established in February 2005 to carry out joint evaluations of the response to the Asian earthquake and tsunamis of 26 December 2004.

The TEC had over 50 member agencies from the United Nations, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Red Cross, as well as private donors. These organizations have been working together since the TEC was established to:

  • Improve policy and practice in the relief and rehabilitation sector.
  • Provide some accountability to both the donor and recipient public.
  • Improve evaluation in the relief and rehabilitation sector by learning from the TEC process itself.

Need for evaluation

The TEC was the most significant evaluation effort in the humanitarian sector since the Joint Evaluation[2] of the response to the Rwanda Crisis in 1994, and followed in the footsteps of Study 3 [3] of that evaluation which examined humanitarian aid and its effects.

Governance

The TEC was guided by a Core Management Group of about 15 members. The TEC was hosted by the Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP)[4] Secretariat in London.

The TEC products

The TEC produced a series of reports:

  • An initial findings report in December 2005.
  • The main synthesis report, the five thematic reports, and the underlying country studies and other subsidiary reports in July 2006.
  • An expanded summary of the synthesis report in January 2007.

All the TEC reports can be found on the TEC website.[5]

The six initial findings

The TEC published an initial findings report[6] in December 2005. These preliminary findings were based on initial reports from the more than fifty consultants involved in the field-work.

The main synthesis report

This report[7] synthesized the whole TEC evaluation effort. The foreword of the report was written by former US President Bill Clinton in his capacity as the United Nations Secretary-General's Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery.

The four main findings dealt with:

  • Local capacities.
  • International support for local actors.
  • The quality of interventions.
  • The unpredictable funding system.

See also

References

  1. ↑ "TEC Index". Archived from the original on 9 February 2006. Retrieved 21 February 2006.
  2. ↑ "The International response to Conflict and Genocide; Lessons from the Rwanda experience". Archived from the original on 2 November 2005. Retrieved 21 February 2006.
  3. ↑ "The International Response to Conflict and Genocide:Lessons from the Rwanda Experience". Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 21 February 2006.
  4. ↑ "Home". alnap.org.
  5. ↑ "Home". tsunami-evaluation.org.
  6. ↑ "Tsunami Evaluation Coalition: Initial Findings" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 March 2006. Retrieved 12 August 2010.
  7. ↑ "Joint evaluation of the international response to the Indian Ocean tsunami: Synthesis Report" (PDF). TEC. July 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 August 2006. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.