The Convent of Pleasure
Portrait of Margaret Cavendish
AuthorMargaret Cavendish
LanguageEarly Modern English
GenreComedy
Publication date
1668

The Convent of Pleasure is a comedic play first published by Margaret Cavendish in 1668. It tells the story of Lady Happy, a noblewoman who chooses to reject marriage in favor of creating a community - the titular “convent” - in which she and other women of noble birth can live free from the constraints of patriarchy. Like much of Cavendish's fiction, it explores utopian ideals and questions the expected roles of women in 17th-century English society.[1]

The play was published under Cavendish's name, which was unusual for a work written by a woman at the time. Cavendish never attempted to have it staged, and instead devised it as something more akin to a closet drama.[2] Also, it is important to note that the ending of the play was supposedly written by her husband William Cavendish who also helped her publish some of her work.[3]

Characters

  • Lady Happy: A wealthy noblewoman who inherits her father's estate and decides to seclude herself inside with a group of other women rather than finding a man to marry.  
  • Madam Mediator: A widow and a friend of Lady Happy who does not join the convent, but is allowed to visit.  
  • The Princess/The Prince: An unnamed suitor who joins the convent in the guise of a woman and develops a romantic relationship with Lady Happy. This character is listed as "The Princess" in the first edition list of characters,[4] and for most of the play, stage directions refer to this character as "Princess." Near the end of the play, an ambassador arrives who declares that the Princess is a prince who has gone missing from his kingdom; from this point, the stage directions refer to this character as the "Prince" rather than the "Princess."[5]
  • Monsieur Take-Pleasure: The informal leader of a group of men who oppose the existence of the convent and devise unsuccessful schemes to bring an end to it. He is accompanied by His Man Dick, as well as Monsieur Facil, Monsieur Adviser, and Monsieur Courtly.  
  • Lady Amorous and Lady Vertue: Two married women who live outside the convent. Friends of Madam Mediator.
  • Mimick: A fool in service of Lady Vertue, who delivers the epilogue of the play.  

Several of the secondary characters also appear in Cavendish's play The Bridals: namely, Lady Amorous, Lady Vertue, Monsieur Take-Pleasure, Monsieur Adviser, and Monsieur Facil.[6]

Summary

Act I begins with three Gentlemen discussing the death of Lady Happy's father, Lord Fortunate. They describe their intent to woo her now that she is independently wealthy. Lady Happy tells Madam Mediator that her own plan is to live with other women and enjoy a life away from men.

In Act II, the Monsieurs disapprove of Lady Happy's plan because it prevents them from acquiring her wealth through marriage. They decide to petition the state to dissolve her convent. Madam Mediator visits the convent and hears from Lady Happy and the other inhabitants about how much they enjoy life inside the convent. She also relates a rumour that an unknown Princess wishes to join the convent. The act ends with the Monsieurs, who have been unable to garner state intervention against the convent, concocting a plan to disguise themselves as working women in order to enter, however, they never achieve to do so.

The Princess is welcomed to the convent at the start of Act III. The Princess notes that many of the women in the convent have paired off together romantically, with some wearing men's clothes. The Princess asks to "act Lovers-parts" in male attire with Lady Happy, who gladly agrees. The women of the convent then stage a play within the play (also called a masque), depicting the miseries which men cause for women: husbands who get drunk, abuse their wives, and spend or gamble all their money; the physical and mental strain of pregnancy, childbirth, and child-rearing; the sorrow of children's deaths; the horror of rape. At the end of this play, the Princess expresses mild disapproval, saying that more people are happy in their marriages than are unhappy.

Act IV begins with a pastoral scene: Lady Happy, dressed as a shepherdess, is feeling overwhelmed by her love for the Princess. The Princess arrives dressed as a shepherd and they embrace and kiss. Another woman dressed as shepherd attempts to woo Lady Happy but is rejected, while the Princess's advances are accepted. The pastoral scene closes with verses believed to be written by Margaret Cavendish's husband. A dance is organized with a prize to be awarded to the best dancers. The prize is awarded to Lady Happy and the Princess. The Princess soliloquizes, resolving to remain with Lady Happy rather than return to the masculine outside world. An extended water-nymph scene follows: the Princess, dressed as Neptune, and Lady Happy, dressed as a sea goddess, sit surrounded by sea-nymphs and describe their luxurious underwater kingdom.

In Act V, Madam Mediator announces that the ladies of the convent have been deceived by a man in women's clothing. The Princess calmly expects to be above suspicion, but an ambassador arrives and addresses the Princess as his Prince. The ambassador reports that their kingdom assumed their prince had been kidnapped, and is now planning to invade Lady Happy's kingdom. The Prince(ss) announces: "since I am discovered, go from me to the Councilors of this State, and inform them of my being here, as also the reason, and that I ask their leave I may marry this Lady; otherwise, tell them I will have her by force of Arms." In a scene labeled as "written by the Duke," Madam Mediator weeps to the gentlemen of the town that the reputation of the convent has been destroyed by the discovery of a man within its walls. After a conversation of sexual innuendo, she asks the gentleman to keep the Princess’s sex a secret, but they tell her that the news is already broadly known. The play ends with the marriage of the Prince and Lady Happy. They dance, and the Prince promises to maintain the convent of pleasure for virgins and widows.

Major themes

Criticism of marriage

The Convent of Pleasure is one of several plays by Cavendish that depict a form of feminist separatist utopia, in which women attempt to improve their lives by avoiding marriage.[1][7][8] As such, a key interpretive question for The Convent of Pleasure is whether Lady Happy's marriage at the end of the play represents a desirable ending, or a simple acknowledgement that for most women, marriage is inevitable.[9][10]

In the play, the economic inequality of Early Modern marriage, in which a woman's property becomes the property of her husband, is represented as an obstacle to companionate marriage.[10] The early scenes of the play repeatedly make the argument that marriage is a primarily economic relationship, and one in which wives are the losing party.[11] By rejecting marriage, Lady Happy also therefore refuses to transfer her personal wealth to a husband. Her personal decision to remove a valuable commodity (herself) from economic circulation is seen by the other characters as a threat to the patriarchal social order.[1][12] The character Monsieur Facil is responding to this threat when he petitions the state to force Lady Happy out of her convent "for the good of the Commonwealth."[1]

The play also emphasizes the non-economic disadvantages of marriage for women, including wives' physical vulnerability to their husbands, the life-threatening danger of childbirth, and the emotional limitations caused by their subordination.[13] Lady Happy repeatedly criticizes the social restraint placed on women by their role as wives.[1] The long and detailed play-within-a-play depicting the suffering of marriage is particularly seen as presenting a categorical rejection of marriage.[13] In contrast, life in the convent is presented as a fundamentally better existence for women.[1] Specifically, it allows them greater bodily autonomy and agency, and the opportunity to enjoy physical pleasure through clothing, food, art and music.[1]

In light of these strong critiques of marriage, analysis of the play often tries to identify the particular qualities of Lady Happy's relationship with the Prince(ss) which might allow them to be happy. These scholars point to Cavendish's reportedly happy marriage to her own husband, and to positive details of the relationship between Lady Happy and the Prince(ss), to support the idea that it is possible for women to desire marriage in a relationship that is non-hierarchical and collaborative.[9][10][7]

Cross-dressing and queer themes

The main plot of the play hinges on cross-dressing, a common theme in Early Modern theatre, especially Shakespeare's comedies.[14] One result of the Prince(ss)'s cross-dressing is that much of the play appears to show a lesbian romance.[2] Some scholars see their relationship as a "fleeting fantasy"[15] of lesbianism, which is overridden by a solidly heterosexual and patriarchal ending.[7] Others see it as the first portrayal of "lesbian love" in English literature,[16] and therefore part of an important history of queer literature.[17] In both readings, the potential for lesbian pleasure is seen as an additional threat to the institution of patriarchal marriage.[18][7]

Within Cavendish's play although the main topic is cross-dressing and female female love, other scholars have also noted the masculinity the Prince(ss) serves in the play.[19] Reason being the constant note of Lady Happy mentioning how “masculine [her] servant" is.[20] Within the text, their romance is seen as unnatural, although the Prince(ss) seems comfortable wearing men's clothing. This argument of male-female-male cross-dressing plays an important role on surprising the audience and breaking the gender norms, further enhancing the queer reading that can be given to The Convent of pleasure.[21]

Recent scholars have also found that other than female-female love, there is a newer theme in queer theory that is being applied to Cavendish's play: asexuality. Lady Happy engages in pleasure without men away from the eye of the public that often sought to penetrate her body (both literally and figuratively), and an uprising scholar has argued that the relationship between the Prince(ss) and Lady Happy could be considered asexual in nature. Scholars argue that the emphasis on pleasure gravitates towards sensuality rather than sexuality, and sensuality can exist in the absence of sexual desire/attraction, also, it is important to note that the characters themselves (Lady Happy and the Prince(ss) never express the need for sexual satisfaction.[22] This further adds to the queer narrative that is assigned to the play, especially because the relationships between the women in the Convent are "intense, even romantic, but not sexual."[22]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bonin, Erin Lang (Spring 2000). "Margaret Cavendish's Dramatic Utopias and the Politics of Gender". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 40 (2): 339–354. doi:10.2307/1556132. JSTOR 1556132.
  2. 1 2 Kellett, Katherine (2008). "Performance, Performativity, and Identity in Margaret Cavendish's "The Convent of Pleasure"". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 48 (2): 419–442. doi:10.1353/sel.0.0002. JSTOR 40071341. S2CID 34766185.
  3. Cunning, David (2017). Margaret Lucas Cavendish. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  4. Cavendish, Margaret (1688). Plays, Never Before Printed. p. 390.
  5. Cavendish, Margaret (1688). Plays, Never Before Printed. p. 382.
  6. "Convent of Pleasure". History Matters/Back To The Future. Archived from the original on 8 November 2019. Retrieved 8 November 2019.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Holmesland, Oddvar (2013). "The Convent of Pleasure (1668): Cross-gendering Negotiation". Utopian Negotiation: Aphra Behn and Margaret Cavendish. Syracuse University Press. pp. 111–143.
  8. Sierra, Horacio (27 July 2009). "Convents As Feminist Utopias: Margaret Cavendish's The Convent of Pleasure and The Potential of Closeted Dramas and Communities". Women's Studies. 38 (6): 647–669. doi:10.1080/00497870903021539. ISSN 0049-7878. S2CID 143032119.
  9. 1 2 Smith, Kelsey Brooke. Perilous Power: Chastity as Political Power in William Shakespeare's Measure for Measure and Margaret Cavendish's Assaulted and Pursued Chastity. Dissertation, Brigham Young University, 2014. BYU, 2014.
  10. 1 2 3 Billing, Valerie (2011). ""Treble marriage": Margaret Cavendish, William Newcastle, and Collaborative Authorship". Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies. 11 (2): 102. doi:10.1353/jem.2011.0022. ISSN 1531-0485. JSTOR 23242154. S2CID 142846393.
  11. Bonin, Erin Lang (Spring 2000). "Margaret Cavendish's Dramatic Utopias and the Politics of Gender". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 40 (2): 347. doi:10.2307/1556132. JSTOR 1556132.
  12. Kellett, Katherine (2008). "Performance, Performativity, and Identity in Margaret Cavendish's "The Convent of Pleasure"". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 48 (2): 424. doi:10.1353/sel.0.0002. JSTOR 40071341.
  13. 1 2 Shaver, Anne (1999). "Agency and Marriage in the Fictions of Lady Mary Wroth and Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle". In King, Sigrid (ed.). Pilgrimage for Love: Essays in Early Modern Literature in Honor of Josephine A. Roberts. Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. p. 177. ISBN 9780866982559.
  14. Cottegnies, Line (July 2013). "Gender and Cross-Dressing in the Seventeenth Century: Margaret Cavendish Reads Shakespeare" (PDF). Testi e Linguaggi.
  15. Tomlinson, Sophie (1992). "'My Brain the Stage': Margaret Cavendish and the Fantasy of Female Performance". In Brant; Purkiss (eds.). Women, Texts, and Histories. pp. 134–63.
  16. Ferguson, Moira (1985). First Feminists: British Women Writers, 1578–1799. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. p. 12.
  17. Jankowski, Theodora A. (1998). "Pure Resistance: Queer(y)ing Virginity in William Shakespeare's 'Measure for Measure' and Margaret Cavendish's 'The Convent of Pleasure'". Shakespeare Studies. 26: 218–55.
  18. Kellett, Katherine (2008). "Performance, Performativity, and Identity in Margaret Cavendish's "The Convent of Pleasure"". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 48 (2): 422. doi:10.1353/sel.0.0002. JSTOR 40071341.
  19. Franco, Chelsea E (26 March 2015). The (Wo)Man in the Masque: Cross-Dressing as Disguise in Early Modern English Literature (Master of Arts English thesis). Florida International University. doi:10.25148/etd.fi15032170.
  20. Newcastle, Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of,?-1674 (1999). The convent of pleasure and other plays. Anne Shaver. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-6099-7. OCLC 40200420.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  21. Chess, Simone (2016). Gender, Performance, and Queer Relations. doi:10.4324/9781315668352. ISBN 9781317360865. S2CID 193073704.
  22. 1 2 Cole, Megan (2021). "Traumatic Pregnancy, Queer Virginity, and Asexual Reproduction in Margaret Cavendish's The Convent of Pleasure". Restoration: Studies in English Literary Culture, 1660-1700. 45 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1353/rst.2021.0000. ISSN 1941-952X. S2CID 236778822.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.