The Best Men Can Be
Video thumbnail for the first short film
ClientGillette
LanguageEnglish
CountryInternational
Official website gillette.com/en-us/the-best-men-can-be

"The Best Men Can Be" was a corporate social responsibility advertising campaign from the safety razor and personal care brand Gillette of Procter & Gamble. The campaign launched on January 13, 2019, with the digital release of a short film entitled We Believe: The Best Men Can Be, which played upon the previous slogan ("The Best a Man Can Get") to address negative behavior among men, including bullying, sexism, sexual misconduct, and toxic masculinity. The campaign includes a three-year commitment by Gillette to make donations to organizations that "[help men] achieve their personal best".[1]

The initial short film was the subject of controversy. While it was praised by some, such as Bernice King, and defended by others, such as Mona Charen, it was generally received negatively by various online commentators, particularly males and conservatives, becoming one of the most disliked videos on YouTube.[2][3] The campaign has led to calls to boycott Gillette and Procter & Gamble.[4][5][6] A successive campaign, #MyBestSelf, was generally praised for its acknowledgement of the transgender community.[7]

Synopsis

The introductory short film for the campaign, We Believe: The Best Men Can Be, directed by Kim Gehrig, begins by invoking the brand's slogan since 1989, "The Best a Man Can Get", by asking "Is this the best a man can get?" This is followed by scenes demonstrating supposed negative behavior among males, including bullying, sexism, sexual misconduct, and toxic masculinity; acknowledgement of social movements, such as #MeToo; and footage of actor Terry Crews stating during Congressional testimony that "men need to hold other men accountable". The ad continues to explain that "we believe in the best in men: To say the right thing, to act the right way", since "the boys watching today will be the men of tomorrow." As a result, the original slogan is re-worked to reinforce this message, becoming "The Best Men Can Be".[2][3]

This campaign includes a companion website, and a pledge by Gillette to donate $1 million per-year over the next three years to organizations, such as Boys & Girls Clubs of America, that "[help men] achieve their personal best". In the aforementioned website, Gillette explains the campaign by stating that "as a company that encourages men to be their best, we have a responsibility to make sure we are promoting positive, attainable, inclusive and healthy versions of what it means to be a man."[8][9]

Reception

Upon its introduction, the advertisement received overwhelming criticism on social media while quickly becoming one of the most disliked videos on YouTube. Gillette was applauded by some for addressing current social issues and promoting positive values among men. Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther King Jr., described the "We Believe" film as being "pro-humanity" and demonstrating that "character can step up to change conditions".[10] At the same time, the advertisement faced criticism and threats of boycotts from critics who said that it emasculated men,[2][3] and who disagreed with its message.[11][12] British journalist and television personality Piers Morgan described the campaign as "a direct consequence of radical feminists" who he said are "driving a war against masculinity".[13]

Regarding their perceived embrace of woke culture and corporate responsibility, Josh Barro of New York magazine compared the ad unfavorably to a recent Nike campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick, arguing that Nike's ad was successful since it was "uplifting rather than accusatory", and consistent with Nike's values as representing "bold action — on and off the field". In regards to Gillette's ad, he said "the viewer is likely to ask: Who is Gillette to tell me this? I just came here for razors. And razors barely even feature in Gillette's new campaign." Barro added that the market for razors was different from that of sporting goods", and that consumers "may be less likely to abandon a product because they feel accused by the brand when their emotional relationship to the brand wasn't the point to begin with."[14]

Writing for the National Review, Mona Charen said that despite criticism to the advertisement coming from other conservatives, and what she described as "undercurrents ... that suggested feminist influence", such as toxic masculinity, she found its imagery to not strike her as "a reproof of masculinity per se but rather as a critique of bullying, boorishness, and sexual misconduct", and argued that "by reflexively rushing to defend men in this context, some conservatives have run smack into an irony. Imagining themselves to be men's champions, they are actually defending behavior, like sexual harassment and bullying, that a generation or two ago conservatives were the ones condemning."[3] Journalist Andrew P. Street expressed a similar argument, considering the negative responses to the ad to be "a living document of how desperately society needs things like the [ad]", and that "if your masculinity is THAT threatened by an ad that says we should be nicer then you're doing masculinity wrong."[2]

Anne Kingston of Maclean's felt that Gillette's parent company Procter & Gamble should have instead focused on addressing gender equality within its board, and pink tax and related gender-based price discrimination, concluding by hoping that "by the time both the boys and girls of today grow up, we'll have exposed and shaved away the pernicious inequities in full display on drugstore shelves. Gillette missed its opportunity. Someone smarter won't."[15] Defending the campaign, Procter & Gamble CEO David S. Taylor stated that "the world would be a better place if my board of directors on down is represented by 50% of the women. We sell our products to more than 50% of the women." The Wall Street Journal cited how the company's board of directors has more than twice as many men as it does women.[16] Marketing Week said the ad backfired on the brand and affected sales metrics.[17] In his video "WOKE BRANDS", YouTuber and cultural critic Harry Brewis argued that the advertisement's intention was in fact to generate controversy as a form of outrage marketing.[18]

Effect on Gillette

In July 2019, six months after the advert was released, the parent company of Gillette, Procter & Gamble announced that while it had record sales for other products, it took an $8 billion write down on its revenue for Gillette. The company said that the write down was due to currency fluctuation, greater competition and a shrinking market as men shave less frequently.[19] Critics of the campaign, however, said that the boycott had hurt the company, and this campaign has since been cited as an example of "go woke, go broke".[20]

#MyBestSelf

In May 2019, Gillette released a video on Facebook,[21] as well as Instagram,[22] entitled "First Shave" as part of a follow-up campaign, #MyBestSelf, which features the story of a recently-transitioned trans man learning to shave from his father. The ad subverted the Gillette slogan, this time by making it inclusive of gender identity. In contrast to "We Believe", the advertisement was generally praised for its acknowledgement of the transgender community.[23][24]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Our Commitment | The Best Men Can Be | Gillette®". Gilette. January 13, 2019. Archived from the original on February 2, 2022. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Topping, Alexandra; Lyons, Kate; Weaver, Matthew (January 15, 2019). "Gillette #MeToo ad on 'toxic masculinity' gets praise – and abuse". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 17, 2019. Retrieved January 17, 2019.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Charen, Mona (January 17, 2019). "Gillette Is Not Wrong". National Review. Archived from the original on December 23, 2020. Retrieved January 17, 2019.
  4. ↑ DeCosta-Klipa, Nik (January 14, 2019). "Gillette released an ad asking men to 'act the right way.' Then came the backlash". Boston.com. Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  5. ↑ Green, Dennis (January 14, 2019). "Gillette chastises men in a new commercial highlighting the #MeToo movement — and some are furious". Business Insider. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  6. ↑ "Gillette faces talks of boycott over ad campaign railing against toxic masculinity". ABC News. January 16, 2019. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  7. ↑ Watson, Imogen (May 26, 2019). "Gillette lauded for groundbreaking transgender ad that champions gender inclusivity". The Drum. Archived from the original on May 27, 2019. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
  8. ↑ Thompson, Sonia (January 14, 2019). "Gillette's New Ad Campaign Is Getting Lots of Buzz. The Reason Has Nothing to Do With Razors". Inc.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2019. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  9. ↑ Naidu, Richa; J, Soundarya (July 30, 2019). "P&G posts strong sales, takes $8 billion Gillette writedown". Reuters. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
  10. ↑ McCluskie, Megan (January 15, 2019). "Gillette Makes Waves With Ad Highlighting 'Toxic Masculinity'". Time. Retrieved January 17, 2019.
  11. ↑ Coffee, Patrick (January 14, 2019). "Gillette Asks How We Define Masculinity in the #MeToo Era as 'The Best a Man Can Get' Turns 30". Adweek. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  12. ↑ Neff, Jack (January 14, 2019). "Gillette's new take on 'Best a Man Can Get' in commercial that invokes #MeToo". Advertising Age. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  13. ↑ Hsu, Tiffany (January 15, 2019). "Gillette Ad With a #MeToo Edge Attracts Support and Outrage". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on January 16, 2019. Retrieved January 17, 2019.
  14. ↑ Barro, Josh (January 15, 2019). "Why Nike's Woke Ad Campaign Works and Gillette's Doesn't". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on January 17, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  15. ↑ Kingston, Anne (January 15, 2019). "If Gillette wants to fix gender inequity, it should start with its razors". Macleans. Archived from the original on January 17, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  16. ↑ Freeman, James (January 29, 2019). "Gillette, Masculinity and 'Authenticity'". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2019. The world would be a better place if my board of directors on down is represented by 50% of the women. We sell our products to more than 50% of the women' ... the company's website suggests that the potentially toxic males outnumber the females by more than two-to-one.
  17. ↑ Vizard, Sarah (January 18, 2019). "Gillette brand takes a hit as '#metoo' ad backfires". Marketing Week. Archived from the original on September 18, 2021. Retrieved September 18, 2021.
  18. ↑ Brewis, Harry (February 22, 2019). WOKE BRANDS (YouTube). Retrieved January 22, 2023.
  19. ↑ "P&G posts strong sales, takes $8 billion Gillette writedown". Reuters. July 20, 2019.
  20. ↑ Stickel, Darryl (2022). Building Trust: Exceptional Leadership in an Uncertain World. Forefront Books. pp. 73–74. ISBN 9781637630792. One of the examples often cited is Gillette's 2019 toxic masculinity advertisement
  21. ↑ Gillette (May 23, 2019). "First Shave, the story of Samson | #MyBestSelf". Facebook. Archived from the original on September 9, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
  22. ↑ Gillette (May 24, 2019). "Instagram post". Instagram. Archived from the original on December 26, 2021. Retrieved August 8, 2019. Whenever, wherever, however it happens—your first shave is special.
  23. ↑ Matthews, David (May 26, 2019). "Gillette releases ad with trans man shaving for the first time". Boston Herald. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
  24. ↑ "Gillette ad features dad teaching trans son how to shave". PinkNews. May 26, 2019. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.