Ontology-based data integration involves the use of one or more ontologies to effectively combine data or information from multiple heterogeneous sources.[1] It is one of the multiple data integration approaches and may be classified as Global-As-View (GAV).[2] The effectiveness of ontology‑based data integration is closely tied to the consistency and expressivity of the ontology used in the integration process.

Background

Data from multiple sources are characterized by multiple types of heterogeneity. The following hierarchy is often used:[3][4][5]

  • Syntactic heterogeneity: is a result of differences in representation format of data
  • Schematic or structural heterogeneity: the native model or structure to store data differ in data sources leading to structural heterogeneity. Schematic heterogeneity that particularly appears in structured databases is also an aspect of structural heterogeneity.[3]
  • Semantic heterogeneity: differences in interpretation of the 'meaning' of data are source of semantic heterogeneity
  • System heterogeneity: use of different operating system, hardware platforms lead to system heterogeneity

Ontologies, as formal models of representation with explicitly defined concepts and named relationships linking them, are used to address the issue of semantic heterogeneity in data sources. In domains like bioinformatics and biomedicine, the rapid development, adoption and public availability of ontologies has made it possible for the data integration community to leverage them for semantic integration of data and information.

The role of ontologies

Ontologies enable the unambiguous identification of entities in heterogeneous information systems and assertion of applicable named relationships that connect these entities together. Specifically, ontologies play the following roles:

Content Explication
[1] The ontology enables accurate interpretation of data from multiple sources through the explicit definition of terms and relationships in the ontology.
Query Model
[1] In some systems like SIMS,[6] the query is formulated using the ontology as a global query schema.
Verification
[1] The ontology verifies the mappings used to integrate data from multiple sources. These mappings may either be user specified or generated by a system.

Approaches using ontologies for data integration

There are three main architectures that are implemented in ontology‑based data integration applications,[1] namely,

Single ontology approach
A single ontology is used as a global reference model in the system. This is the simplest approach as it can be simulated by other approaches.[1] SIMS[6] a prominent example of this approach. The Structured Knowledge Source Integration component of Research Cyc is another prominent example of this approach.[7][8] (Title = Harnessing Cyc to Answer Clinical Researchers' Ad Hoc Queries). The Gellish Taxonomic Dictionary-Ontology follows this approach as well.[9]
Multiple ontologies
Multiple ontologies, each modeling an individual data source, are used in combination for integration. Though, this approach is more flexible than the single ontology approach, it requires creation of mappings between the multiple ontologies. Ontology mapping is a challenging issue and is focus of large number of research efforts in computer science . The OBSERVER system[10] is an example of this approach.
Hybrid approaches
The hybrid approach involves the use of multiple ontologies that subscribe to a common, top-level vocabulary.[11] The top-level vocabulary defines the basic terms of the domain. Thus, the hybrid approach makes it easier to use multiple ontologies for integration in presence of the common vocabulary.

See also

Further reading

  • Chicco, D; Masseroli, M (2016). "Ontology-based prediction and prioritization of gene functional annotations". IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 13 (2): 248–260. doi:10.1109/TCBB.2015.2459694. PMID 27045825. S2CID 2795344.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 H. Wache; T. Vögele; U. Visser; H. Stuckenschmidt; G. Schuster; H. Neumann; S. Hübner (2001). Ontology-Based Integration of Information A Survey of Existing Approaches. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.142.4390.
  2. ↑ Maurizio Lenzerini (2002). Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective (PDF). pp. 243–246.
  3. 1 2 A.P. Sheth (1999). "Changing Focus on Interoperability in Information Systems: From System, Syntax, Structure to Semantics". Interoperating Geographic Information Systems. M. F. Goodchild, M. J. Egenhofer, R. Fegeas, and C. A. Kottman (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers (PDF). pp. 5–30.
  4. ↑ AHM02 Tutorial 5: Data Integration and Mediation; Contributors: B. Ludaescher, I. Altintas, A. Gupta, M. Martone, R. Marciano, X. Qian
  5. ↑ "AHM02 Tutorial 5: Data Integration and Mediation". users.sdsc.edu. Retrieved 2017-11-23.
  6. 1 2 Y. Arens; C. Hsu; C.A. Knoblock (1996). Query Processing in sims information mediator (PDF).
  7. ↑ "Semantic Knowledge Source Integration | Cycorp". www.cyc.com. Archived from the original on 2014-05-17.
  8. ↑ "Harnessing Cyc to Answer Clinical Researchers' Ad Hoc Queries | Lenat | AI Magazine". Archived from the original on 2010-12-31. Retrieved 2014-05-15.
  9. ↑ "Home". gellish.net.
  10. ↑ E. Mena; V. Kashyap; A. Sheth; A. Illarramendi (1996). OBSERVER: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems based on Interoperation across Pre-existing Ontologies (PDF).
  11. ↑ Cheng Hian Goh (1997). Representing and Reasoning about Semantic Conflicts in Heterogeneous Information Systems (PDF).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.