John Samuel Ball (born 1963) is an American cognitive scientist, an expert in machine intelligence,[1] computer architecture and the inventor of Patom Theory.[2]
Biography
Born in Iowa USA whilst his Australian father Samuel Ball was working on his PhD in Educational Psychology, Ball returned with the family to Australia in 1978 to finish his secondary schooling on the north shore of Sydney. Ball received a Bachelor of Science in 1984 from the University of Sydney, a Masters of Cognitive Science from University of NSW in 1989 and a Master of Business Administration from MGSM (Macquarie Graduate School of Management) in 1997.
From a young age, Ball was fascinated by computers having been exposed to early mainframes at Educational Testing Service (ETS) in Princeton in the 1970s.
He was challenged by a lecturer as an undergraduate to pursue machine intelligence when she announced that computers would never be able to perform human like functions such as language or visual recognition.
Work
His career begun at IBM Australia as a mainframe engineer, leading to country support specialist responsible for supporting and training hardware engineers across Australia and New Zealand on mainframe and I/O devices. His expertise was in the IBM 370 I/O architecture, learning from global designer of channel architecture, Kenneth Trowell. Following IBM in 1996 he worked in other large Australian corporations managing and defining the commercials of complex IT contracts between stakeholders.
Always interested in how machines could better emulate human brain functions, he postulated Patom theory – the word representing a combination of pattern matching and atom. This reflected his belief that the brain simply stores, matches and uses hierarchical, bidirectional linkset patterns (sequences and sets) as sufficient to explain human capabilities. This he claimed was the approach of the human brain to language and vision and was first publicly aired in 2000, on Robyn Williams’ Okham's Razor.[3]
Over the years, exchanges with Artificial Intelligence experts such as Marvin Minsky led him to work on a prototype to demonstrate and prove his theory.[4]
Ball left corporate life to focus full-time on proving a natural language understanding (NLU) system with samples across diverse languages including Mandarin, Korean, German, Japanese, Spanish, English, French, Italian and Portuguese. Since 2007, Ball has filed two patents.[5]
In 2011 Ball came across a book of Emma L. Pavey's [6] whilst visiting a Barnes & Noble store in Princeton, New Jersey. This included a reference to a linguistic theory developed by Professor Robert Van Valin, Jr. and Professor William A. Foley, called Role & Reference Grammar (RRG).[7] Ball determined the explanation of a meaning based linguistic framework described in Pavey's book, to be the missing link for implementation of his theory. He contacted Van Valin and began integrating RRG into his prototype. Unlike dominant linguistic theories such as Universal Grammar, by Noam Chomsky, Ball's approach focused on meaning and provided a way for computers to break down any human language by meaning enabling communications between man and machine. In Van Valin's Paper, From NLP to NLU,[8] Van Valin talks about progressing from natural language processing (NLP) to NLU with the introduction of meaning achieved by the combination of RRG & Patom theory.
In 2014, The University of Sydney completed an external review analyzing its capabilities across Word-sense disambiguation (WSD), context tracking, word boundary identification, machine translation and conversation. By 2015, Ball had included samples across nine languages and could demonstrate a solution to open scientific problems in the field of NLU, including:
- Word Sense Disambiguation
- Context Tracking
- Machine Translation
- Word Boundary Identification
In 2015, Ball wrote a seven-part series for Computerworld,[9] Speaking Artificial Intelligence in which he traced the dominant approaches of statistical analysis and machine learning, from the 1980s to the present.
Applications for this technology and its implications for intelligent machines have been published by Dr Hossein Eslambolchi in World Economic Forum.[10]
Ball's work to date refutes the commonly held belief that the human brain ‘processes’ information like a computer. His lab work and NLU demonstrate human-like conversation and accuracy in translation, written about in his papers "The Science of NLU" and "Patom Theory".[11][12]
In December 2018, his machine intelligence company, Pat Inc received the award of 'Best New Algorithm for AI' by London-based Into.AI organization as recognition of his novel approach to AI-hard problem, natural-language understanding. Pat Inc also won the Best Technical Implementation for AI, 2019/2020 by Into.AI
Publications
Using NLU in Context for Question Answering: Improving on Facebook's bAbI Tasks
Speaking Artificial Intelligence
How Brains Work: Patom Theory’s Support from RRG Linguistics
References
- ↑ Ball, John (16 April 2016). Machine Intelligence (2 ed.). Hired Pen Publishing.
- ↑ Ball, John. "Mr" (PDF). Heinrich Heine University. Retrieved 7 May 2016.
- ↑ Williams, Robyn (16 January 2000). "Our Brain, the Patom-Matcher". ABC Radio National.
- ↑ Ball, John (16 April 2016). Machine Intelligence (2 ed.). Hired Pen Publishing.
- ↑ Ball, John (2007). "USPTO".
- ↑ Pavey, Emma L (31 August 2010). The Structure of Language. The Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
- ↑ Van Valin, Robert. "A Summary of Role and Reference Grammar" (PDF). The State University of New York at Buffalo. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
- ↑ Van Valin, Robert. "From NLP to NLU" (PDF). Heinrich Heine University. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
- ↑ Ball, John (2015). "Speaking Artificial Intelligence". Computerworld.
- ↑ Eslambolchi, Hossein (2015). "When will we be able to have a conversation with a computer?". World Economic Forum.
- ↑ Ball, John. "Patom Theory" (PDF).
- ↑ Ball, John. "The Science of NLU" (PDF).
External links