Square pyramid
TypeJohnson
J92J1J2
Faces4 triangles
1 square
Edges8
Vertices5
Vertex configuration[1]
Symmetry group
Volume
Dual polyhedronself-dual[2]
Propertiesconvex
Net

In geometry, a square pyramid is a pyramid with a square base, having a total of five faces. If the apex of the pyramid is directly above the center of the square, it is a right square pyramid with four isosceles triangles; otherwise, it is an oblique square pyramid. When all of the pyramid's edges are equal in length, its triangles are all equilateral, and it is called an equilateral square pyramid.

Square pyramids have appeared throughout the history of architecture, with examples being Egyptian pyramids, and many other similar buildings. They also occur in chemistry in square pyramidal molecular structures. Square pyramids are often used in the construction of other polyhedra. Many mathematicians in ancient times discovered the formula for the volume of a square pyramid with different approaches.

Properties

Right and equilateral square pyramid

A square pyramid has five vertices, eight edges, and five faces. One face, called the base of the pyramid, is a square; the four other faces are triangles.[3] Four of the edges make up the square by connecting its four vertices. The other four edges are known as the lateral edges of the pyramid; they meet at the fifth vertex, called the apex.[4] If the pyramid's apex lies on a line erected perpendicularly from the center of the square, it is called a right square pyramid, and the four triangular faces are isosceles triangles. Otherwise, the pyramid has two or more non-isosceles triangular faces and is called an oblique square pyramid.[5]

3D model of an equilateral square pyramid

If all triangular edges are of equal length, the four triangles are equilateral, and the pyramid's faces are all regular polygons, it is an equilateral square pyramid.[6] The dihedral angles between adjacent triangular faces are , and that between the base and each triangular face being half of that, .[1] A convex polyhedron with only regular polygons as faces is called a Johnson solid, and the equilateral square pyramid is the first Johnson solid, enumerated as .[7] Like other right pyramids with a regular polygon as a base, a right square pyramid has pyramidal symmetry. For the square pyramid, this is the symmetry of cyclic group : the pyramid is left invariant by rotations of one-, two-, and three-quarters of a full turn around its axis of symmetry, the line connecting the apex to the center of the base. It is also mirror symmetric relative to any perpendicular plane passing through a bisector of the base.[1] It can be represented as the wheel graph ; more generally, a wheel graph is the representation of the skeleton of a -sided pyramid.[8]

Surface area and volume

The slant height of a right square pyramid is defined as the height of one of its isosceles triangles. It can be obtained via the Pythagorean theorem:

where is the length of the triangle's base, also one of the square's edges, and is the length of the triangle's legs, which are lateral edges of the pyramid.[9] The height of a right square pyramid can be similarly obtained, with a substitution of the slant height formula giving:[10]

A polyhedron's surface area is the sum of the areas of its faces. The surface area of a right square pyramid can be expressed as , where and are the areas of one of its triangles and its base, respectively. The area of a triangle is half of the product of its base and side, with the area of a square being the length of the side squared. This gives the expression:[11]

In general, the volume of a pyramid is equal to one-third of the area of its base multiplied by its height.[12] Expressed in a formula for a square pyramid, this is:[13]

Many mathematicians have discovered the formula for calculating the volume of a square pyramid in ancient times. In the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus, Egyptian mathematicians demonstrated knowledge of the formula for calculating the volume of a truncated square pyramid, suggesting that they were also acquainted with the volume of a square pyramid, but it is unknown how the formula was derived. Beyond the discovery of the volume of a square pyramid, the problem of finding the slope and height of a square pyramid can be found in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus.[14] The Babylonian mathematicians also considered the volume of a frustum, but gave an incorrect formula for it.[15] One Chinese mathematician Liu Hui also discovered the volume by the method of dissecting a rectangular solid into pieces.[16]

Applications

The Egyptian pyramids are an example of square pyramidal buildings in architecture
One of the Mesoamerican pyramids, a similar building to the Egyptian, has flat tops and stairs at the faces.

In architecture, the pyramids built in ancient Egypt are examples of buildings shaped like square pyramids.[17] Pyramidologists have put forward various suggestions for the design of the Great Pyramid of Giza, including a theory based on the Kepler triangle and the golden ratio. However, modern scholars favor descriptions using integer ratios, as being more consistent with the knowledge of Egyptian mathematics and proportion.[18] The Mesoamerican pyramids are also ancient pyramidal buildings similar to the Egyptian; they differ in having flat tops and stairs ascending their faces.[19] Modern buildings whose designs imitate the Egyptian pyramids include the Louvre Pyramid and the casino hotel Luxor Las Vegas.[20]

In stereochemistry, an atom cluster can have a square pyramidal geometry. A square pyramidal molecule has a main-group element with one active lone pair, which can be described by a model that predicts the geometry of molecules known as VSEPR theory.[21] Examples of molecules with this structure include chlorine pentafluoride, bromine pentafluoride, and iodine pentafluoride.[22]

Tetrakis hexahedra, a construction of polyhedra by augmentation involving square pyramids

The base of a square pyramid can be attached to a square face of another polyhedron to construct new polyhedra, an example of augmentation. For example, a tetrakis hexahedron can be constructed by attaching the base of an equilateral square pyramid onto each face of a cube.[23] Attaching prisms or antiprisms to pyramids is known as elongation or gyroelongation, respectively.[24] Some of the other Johnson solids can be constructed by either augmenting square pyramids or augmenting other shapes with square pyramids: elongated square pyramid , gyroelongated square pyramid , elongated square bipyramid , gyroelongated square bipyramid , augmented triangular prism , biaugmented triangular prism , triaugmented triangular prism , augmented pentagonal prism , biaugmented pentagonal prism , augmented hexagonal prism , parabiaugmented hexagonal prism , metabiaugmented hexagonal prism , triaugmented hexagonal prism , and augmented sphenocorona .[25]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Johnson (1966).
  2. Wohlleben (2019), p. 485–486.
  3. Clissold (2020), p. 180.
  4. O'Keeffe & Hyde (2020), p. 141; Smith (2000), p. 98.
  5. Freitag (2014), p. 598.
  6. Hocevar (1903), p. 44.
  7. Uehara (2020), p. 62.
  8. Pisanski & Servatius (2013), p. 21.
  9. Larcombe (1929), p. 177; Perry & Perry (1981), pp. 145–146.
  10. Larcombe (1929), p. 177.
  11. Freitag (2014), p. 798.
  12. Alexander & Koeberlin (2014), p. 403.
  13. Larcombe (1929), p. 178.
  14. Cromwell (1997), pp. 20–22.
  15. Eves (1997), p. 2.
  16. Wagner (1979).
  17. Kinsey, Moore & Prassidis (2011), p. 371.
  18. Herz-Fischler (2000) surveys many alternative theories for this pyramid's shape. See Chapter 11, "Kepler triangle theory", pp. 80–91, for material specific to the Kepler triangle, and p. 166 for the conclusion that the Kepler triangle theory can be eliminated by the principle that "A theory must correspond to a level of mathematics consistent with what was known to the ancient Egyptians." See note 3, p. 229, for the history of Kepler's work with this triangle. See Rossi (2004), pp. 67–68, quoting that "there is no direct evidence in any ancient Egyptian written mathematical source of any arithmetic calculation or geometrical construction which could be classified as the Golden Section ... convergence to , and itself as a number, do not fit with the extant Middle Kingdom mathematical sources"; see also extensive discussion of multiple alternative theories for the shape of the pyramid and other Egyptian architecture, pp. 7–56. See also Rossi & Tout (2002) and Markowsky (1992).
  19. Feder (2010), p. 34; Takacs & Cline (2015), p. 16.
  20. Jarvis & Naested (2012), p. 172; Simonson (2011), p. 154.
  21. Petrucci, Harwood & Herring (2002), p. 414.
  22. Emeléus (1969), p. 13.
  23. Demey & Smessaert (2017).
  24. Slobodan, Obradović & Ðukanović (2015).
  25. Rajwade (2001), pp. 84–89. See Table 12.3, where denotes the -sided prism and denotes the -sided antiprism.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.