In general topology, a subset of a topological space is said to be dense-in-itself[1][2] or crowded[3][4] if has no isolated point. Equivalently, is dense-in-itself if every point of is a limit point of . Thus is dense-in-itself if and only if , where is the derived set of .
A dense-in-itself closed set is called a perfect set. (In other words, a perfect set is a closed set without isolated point.)
The notion of dense set is distinct from dense-in-itself. This can sometimes be confusing, as "X is dense in X" (always true) is not the same as "X is dense-in-itself" (no isolated point).
Examples
A simple example of a set that is dense-in-itself but not closed (and hence not a perfect set) is the set of irrational numbers (considered as a subset of the real numbers). This set is dense-in-itself because every neighborhood of an irrational number contains at least one other irrational number . On the other hand, the set of irrationals is not closed because every rational number lies in its closure. Similarly, the set of rational numbers is also dense-in-itself but not closed in the space of real numbers.
The above examples, the irrationals and the rationals, are also dense sets in their topological space, namely . As an example that is dense-in-itself but not dense in its topological space, consider . This set is not dense in but is dense-in-itself.
Properties
A singleton subset of a space can never be dense-in-itself, because its unique point is isolated in it.
The dense-in-itself subsets of any space are closed under unions.[5] In a dense-in-itself space, they include all open sets.[6] In a dense-in-itself T1 space they include all dense sets.[7] However, spaces that are not T1 may have dense subsets that are not dense-in-itself: for example in the dense-in-itself space with the indiscrete topology, the set is dense, but is not dense-in-itself.
The closure of any dense-in-itself set is a perfect set.[8]
In general, the intersection of two dense-in-itself sets is not dense-in-itself. But the intersection of a dense-in-itself set and an open set is dense-in-itself.
See also
Notes
- ↑ Steen & Seebach, p. 6
- ↑ Engelking, p. 25
- ↑ Levy, Ronnie; Porter, Jack (1996). "On Two questions of Arhangel'skii and Collins regarding submaximal spaces" (PDF). Topology Proceedings. 21: 143–154.
- ↑ Dontchev, Julian; Ganster, Maximilian; Rose, David (1977). "α-Scattered spaces II".
- ↑ Engelking, 1.7.10, p. 59
- ↑ Kuratowski, p. 78
- ↑ Kuratowski, p. 78
- ↑ Kuratowski, p. 77
References
- Engelking, Ryszard (1989). General Topology. Heldermann Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-88538-006-4.
- Kuratowski, K. (1966). Topology Vol. I. Academic Press. ISBN 012429202X.
- Steen, Lynn Arthur; Seebach, J. Arthur Jr. (1978). Counterexamples in Topology (Dover reprint of 1978 ed.). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-486-68735-3. MR 0507446.
This article incorporates material from Dense in-itself on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.