De Leon v. Perry
No. 5:13-cv-982
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Full case nameCleopatra de Leon, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. Rick Perry, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, et. al. Defendants.
Case history
Prior action(s)Judge Orlando Luis Garcia, W.D. Tex., struck down Texas' ban on same-sex marriage.
Holding
Texas's ban on same-sex marriage violates the Fourteenth Amendment per Obergefell v. Hodges.
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingPatrick Higginbotham, Jerry Edwin Smith, James E. Graves, Jr.
Case opinions
MajoritySmith, joined by Higginbotham, Graves
Keywords
Marriage, Equal Protection, Same-sex marriage, Sexual Orientation

De Leon v. Perry was a federal lawsuit challenging Texas marriage law, specifically the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and corresponding statutes. A U.S. district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff same-sex couples on February 26, 2014, granting their motion for a preliminary injunction. The state defendants filed an interlocutory appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, as the disposition on the motion was not a final ruling in the case. On April 14, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion for an expedited hearing, which was denied on May 21, 2014. The plaintiffs filed another motion for an expedited hearing on October 6, 2014, after the Supreme Court of the United States denied appeals in other marriage equality cases, and the motion was granted on October 7, 2014, setting a hearing for November 2014. However, on October 27, 2014, the Fifth Circuit set oral arguments for January 9, 2015.[1]

The Fifth Circuit heard oral argument on January 9, 2015. The case was still pending in the Fifth Circuit when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges that the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples is unconstitutional. On July 1, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Background

Article I, Section 32 of the Constitution of Texas, added via referendum as Proposition 2 on November 8, 2005, specifically banned same-sex marriage by definition: "Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman."

Plaintiffs in the case are Mark Phariss and Victor ("Vic") Holmes, then an unmarried gay couple who wished to marry in-state, and Nicole Dimetman and Cleopatra De Leon, a lesbian couple lawfully married in Massachusetts wanting in-state recognition of that marriage. The lead named plaintiff, Cleopatra De Leon, is a U.S. Air Force and Texas Air National Guard veteran, and in a committed relationship with her wife for 12 years at the time of the filing of the suit. Victor Holmes, a retired United States Air Force major who served almost 23 years, and Mark Phariss, a corporate attorney, were in a committed relationship for 16 years at the time of the filing of the lawsuit.[2] On the other end, the lead named defendant is Rick Perry, sued in his official capacity as the Governor of Texas.

U.S. district court action

On October 28, 2013, the plaintiffs filed suit in U.S. district court, challenging the Texas' same-sex marriage ban. The case was assigned to Federal District Judge Orlando Garcia.[3]

The district judge heard oral arguments on February 12, 2014, forecasting that the issue of same-sex marriage "will make its way to the Supreme Court".[4] Arguing for the state, Assistant Texas Solicitor General Mike Murphy said: "The purpose of Texas marriage law is not to discriminate against same-sex couples but to promote responsible procreation" and that a heterosexual couple provides the best environment for childrearing.[5]

On February 26, Garcia ruled against Texas' ban on same-sex marriage, writing that "Texas' current marriage laws deny homosexual couples the right to marry, and in doing so, demean their dignity for no legitimate reason".[6] Garcia agreed with the plaintiffs' argument that homosexuals are a suspect class entitled to a more exacting standard of review, heightened scrutiny, but found that the state's arguments fail "even under the most deferential rational basis level of review" regarding equal protection. Regarding due process and the denial of a fundamental right, he wrote that the state's ban must be reviewed under the strict scrutiny standard. He ruled that the state has "failed to identify any rational, much less a compelling, reason that is served by denying same-sex couples the fundamental right to marry".[7] He stayed enforcement of his ruling pending appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.[8][9]

U.S. Court of Appeals action

Attorney General Greg Abbott said the state would appeal the decision. Governor Rick Perry said: "The 10th Amendment guarantees Texas voters the freedom to make these decisions, and this is yet another attempt to achieve via the courts what couldn't be achieved at the ballot box. We will continue to fight for the rights of Texans to self-determine the laws of our state."[10] On November 24, the plaintiffs asked the district court to lift its stay, noting that the U.S. Supreme Court has denied stays in similar cases and dissolved stays by denying cert in several more.[11] The district court denied that request on December 12.[12] The Fifth Circuit heard oral argument on January 9, 2015, before Judges Patrick E. Higginbotham, Jerry E. Smith, and James E. Graves, Jr.[13]

On February 12, the plaintiffs asked the Fifth Circuit to lift the stay, citing the refusal of the U.S. Supreme to extend stays in similar Alabama and Florida cases, or at the least lift the stay with respect to plaintiffs De Leon and Dimetman, who expected the birth of their child on March 15 and sought to avoid the adoption process.[14]

The case and the motion to lift the stay was still pending in the Fifth Circuit when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges that the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples is unconstitutional. On July 1, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.[15] The ruling of the Fifth Circuit Court required Judge Garcia of the District Court to enter his final judgment on the case by July 17, 2015.[16]

Pursuant to the Fifth Circuit's order, the district court entered a final judgment on July 7, 2015, permanently enjoining the State of Texas from enforcing any laws prohibiting any same-sex marriage. Subsequently, in December 2015, the district court awarded more than $605,000 in legal fees and costs to the plaintiffs' law firm, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.[17] The Fifth Circuit affirmed the award of legal fees in a 2-1 per curiam decision on April 18, 2017.[18]

Post-decision

The plaintiffs, Mark Phariss and Vic Holmes, were later married on November 21, 2015, in Frisco, Texas, at the Westin Stonebriar Hotel after more than 18 years together by former Congressman Charles A. Gonzalez.[19][20] A book about them titled The Accidental Activists: Mark Phariss, Vic Holmes, and Their Fight for Marriage Equality in Texas by David Collins and published by the University North Texas Press was released in July 2017.[21]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original on May 5, 2017. Retrieved May 15, 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  2. ↑ Christopher Kelly (February 2014). "The Accidental Activists". Texas Monthly.
  3. ↑ Parker, Kolten (December 11, 2013). "Federal judge sets hearing on Texas same-sex marriage ban". mysanantonio.com. Retrieved January 18, 2014.
  4. ↑ Tomlinson, Chris (February 12, 2014). "Federal judge hears arguments in lawsuit challenging ban on gay marriage in Texas Constitution". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
  5. ↑ Garrett, Robert T. (February 12, 2014). "Federal judge hears request to block Texas ban on same-sex marriage". Dallas News. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
  6. ↑ Brubaker Calkins, Laurel (February 27, 2014). "Texas Gay-Marriage Ban Held Illegal as Judge Delays Order". Bloomberg News. Retrieved March 9, 2014.
  7. ↑ Orlando Luis Garcia (February 26, 2014). "United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Case 5:13-cv-00982-OLG, Doc 73 - ORDER on Preliminary Injunction". United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. scribd.com. Retrieved March 11, 2014.
  8. ↑ Garrett, Robert (February 26, 2014). "Federal judge voids Texas' gay marriage ban, though he delays order from taking effect immediately". Dallas News. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
  9. ↑ Lindell, Chuck (February 26, 2014). "Judge overturns Texas ban on gay marriage". Austin American Statesman. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
  10. ↑ Snow, Justin (February 26, 2014). "Federal court finds Texas ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional". Metro Weekly. Archived from the original on February 26, 2014. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
  11. ↑ "Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Lift Stay". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Retrieved November 24, 2014.
  12. ↑ Contreras, Guillermo (December 12, 2014). "Judge: Texas gay marriage ban will remain in place for now". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  13. ↑ Colloff, Pamela (January 9, 2015). "Fifth Circuit Hears Texas' Same-Sex Marriage Lawsuit". Texas Monthly. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  14. ↑ "Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Lift Stay of Injunction". Scribd.com. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  15. ↑ "Texas 5th Circuit Opinion". Equality Case Files. Retrieved July 1, 2015.
  16. ↑ Alexa Ura (July 1, 2015). "Texas Concedes Legal Challenge to Same-Sex Marriage Ban". Texas Tribune.
  17. ↑ John Wright (December 4, 2015). "Texas to Pick Up $605,000 Tab in Same-Sex Marriage Case". Texas Observer.
  18. ↑ "Court document" (PDF). uscourts.gov. April 18, 2017. Retrieved April 17, 2023.
  19. ↑ "Mark Phariss, Victor Holmes". New York Times. November 22, 2015.
  20. ↑ Greta Kaul (November 21, 2015). "A wedding at last for couple that challenged Texas' gay marriage ban". San Antonio Express-News.
  21. ↑ Collins, David (2017). Accidental Activists: Mark Phariss, Vic Holmes, and Their Fight for Marriage Equality in Texas. ISBN 978-1574416923.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.