1000 Plant Genomes Project
Funding agency
Duration2008 – 2019
Websitewww.onekp.com

The 1000 Plant Transcriptomes Initiative (1KP) was an international research effort to establish the most detailed catalogue of genetic variation in plants. It was announced in 2008 and headed by Gane Ka-Shu Wong and Michael Deyholos of the University of Alberta. The project successfully sequenced the transcriptomes (expressed genes) of 1000 different plant species by 2014;[1][2] its final capstone products were published in 2019.[3][4][5]

1KP was one of the large-scale (involving many organisms) sequencing projects designed to take advantage of the wider availability of high-throughput ("next-generation") DNA sequencing technologies. The similar 1000 Genomes Project, for example, obtained high-coverage genome sequences of 1000 individual people between 2008 and 2015, to better understand human genetic variation.[6][7] This project providing a template for further planetary-scale genome projects including the 10KP Project sequencing the whole genomes of 10,000 Plants,[8] and the Earth BioGenome Project, aiming to sequence, catalog, and characterize the genomes of all of Earth's eukaryotic biodiversity.[9]

Goals

As of 2002, the number of classified green plant species was estimated to be around 370,000, however, there are probably many thousands more yet unclassified.[10] Despite this number, very few of these species have detailed DNA sequence information to date; 125,426 species in GenBank, as of 11 April 2012,[11] but most (>95%) having DNA sequence for only one or two genes. "...almost none of the roughly half million plant species known to humanity has been touched by genomics at any level".[1] The 1000 Plant Genomes Project aimed to produce a roughly a 100x increase in the number of plant species with available broad genome sequence.

Evolutionary relationships

There have been efforts to determine the evolutionary relationships between the known plant species,[12][13] but phylogenies (or phylogenetic trees) created solely using morphological data, cellular structures, single enzymes, or on only a few sequences (like rRNA) can be prone to error;[14] morphological features are especially vulnerable when two species look physically similar though they are not closely related (as a result of convergent evolution for example) or homology, or when two species closely related look very different because, for example, they are able to change in response to their environment very well. These situations are very common in the plant kingdom. An alternative method for constructing evolutionary relationships is through changes in DNA sequence of many genes between the different species which is often more robust to problems of similar-appearing species.[14] With the amount of genomic sequence produced by this project, many predicted evolutionary relationships could be better tested by sequence alignment to improve their certainty. With 383,679 nuclear gene family phylogenies and 2,306 gene age distributions with Ks plots used in the final analysis and shared in GigaDB alongside the capstone paper.[15]

Biotechnology applications

The list of plant genomes sequenced in the project was not random; instead plants that produce valuable chemicals or other products (secondary metabolites in many cases) were focused on in the hopes that characterizing the involved genes will allow the underlying biosynthetic processes to be used or modified.[1] For example, there are many plants known to produce oils (like olives) and some of the oils from certain plants bear a strong chemical resemblance to petroleum products like the Oil palm and hydrocarbon-producing species.[16] If these plant mechanisms could be used to produce mass quantities of industrially useful oil, or modified such that they do, then they would be of great value. Here, knowing the sequence of the plant's genes involved in the metabolic pathway producing the oil is a large first step to allow such utilization. A recent example of how engineering natural biochemical pathways works is Golden rice which has involved genetically modifying its pathway, so that a precursor to vitamin A is produced in large quantities making the brown-colored rice a potential solution for vitamin A deficiency.[17] This is concept of engineering plants to do "work" is popular[18] and its potential would dramatically increase as a result of gene information on these 1000 plant species. Biosynthetic pathways could also be used for mass production of medicinal compounds using plants rather than manual organic chemical reactions as most are created currently.

One of the most unexpected results of the project was the discovery of multiple novel light-sensitive ion-channels used extensively for optogenetic control of neurons discovered through sequencing and physiological characterization of opsins from over 100 species of alga species by the project.[19] The characterization of these novel channelrhodopsin sequences providing resources for protein engineers who would normally have no interest in or ability to generate sequence data from these many plant species.[20] A number of biotech companies are developing these channelrhodopsin proteins for medical purposes, with many of these optogenetic therapy candidates under clinical trials to restore vision for retinal blindness. The first published results of these treating retinitis pigmentosa coming out in July 2021.[21]

Project approach

Sequencing was initially done on the Illumina Genome Analyzer GAII next-generation DNA sequencing platform at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI Shenzhen, China), but later samples were run on the faster Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Starting with the 28 Illumina Genome Analyzer next-generation DNA sequencing machines, these were eventually upgraded to 100 HiSeq 2000 sequencers at the Beijing Genomics Institute. The initial 3Gb/run (3 billion base pairs per experiment) capacity of each of these machines enabled fast and accurate sequencing of the plant samples.[22]

Species selection

The selection of plant species to be sequenced was compiled through an international collaboration of the various funding agencies and researcher groups expressing their interest in certain plants.[1] There was a focus on those plant species that are known to have useful biosynthetic capacity to facilitate the biotechnology goals of the project, and selection of other species to fill in gaps and explain some unknown evolutionary relationships of the current plant phylogeny. In addition to industrial compound biosynthetic capacity, plant species known or suspected to produce medically active chemicals (such as poppies producing opiates) were assigned a high priority to better understand the synthesis process, explore commercial production potential, and discover new pharmaceutical options. A large number of plant species with medicinal properties were selected from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).[1] The completed list of selected species can be publicly viewed on the website,[23] and methodological details and data access details have been published in detail.[5][24]

Transcriptome vs. genome sequencing

Rather than sequencing the entire genome (all DNA sequence) of the various plant species, the project sequenced only those regions of the genome that produce a protein product (coding genes); the transcriptome.[1] This approach is justified by the focus on biochemical pathways where only the genes producing the involved proteins are required to understand the synthetic mechanism, and because these thousands of sequences would represent adequate sequence detail to construct very robust evolutionary relationships through sequence comparison. The numbers of coding genes in plant species can vary considerably, but all have tens of thousands or more making the transcriptome a large collection of information. However, non-coding sequence makes up the majority (>90%) of the genome content.[25] Although this approach is similar conceptually to expressed sequence tags (ESTs), it is fundamentally different in that the entire sequence of each gene will be acquired with high coverage rather than just a small portion of the gene sequence with an EST.[26] To distinguish the two, the non-EST method is known as "shotgun transcriptome sequencing".[26]

Transcriptome shotgun sequencing

mRNA (messenger RNA) is collected from a sample, converted to cDNA by a reverse transcriptase enzyme, and then fragmented so that it can be sequenced.[1][22] Other than transcriptome shotgun sequencing, this technique has been called RNA-seq and whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (WTSS).[26] Once the cDNA fragments are sequenced, they will be de novo assembled (without aligning to a reference genome sequence) back into the complete gene sequence by combining all of the fragments from that gene during the data analysis phase. A new a de novo transcriptome assembler designed specifically for RNA-Seq was produced for this project,[27] SOAPdenovo-Trans being part of the SOAP suite of genome assembly tools from the BGI.

Plant tissue sampling

The samples came from around the world, with a number of particularly rare species being supplied by botanical gardens such as the Fairy Lake Botanical Garden (Shenzhen, China). The type of tissue collected was determined by the expected location of biosynthetic activity; for example if an interesting process or chemical is known to exist primarily in the leaves, leaf sample was used. A number of RNA-sequencing protocols were adapted and tested for different tissue types,[24] and these were openly shared via the protocols.io platform.[28]

Potential limitations

Since only the transcriptome was sequenced, the project did not reveal information about gene regulatory sequence, non-coding RNAs, DNA repetitive elements, or other genomic features that are not part of the coding sequence. Based on the few whole plant genomes collected so far, these non-coding regions will in fact make up the majority of the genome,[25][29] and the non-coding DNA may actually be the primary driver of trait differences seen between species.[30]

Since mRNA was the starting material, the amount of sequence representation for a given gene is based on the expression level (how many mRNA molecules it produces). This means that highly expressed genes get better coverage because there is more sequence to work from.[30] The result, then, is that some important genes may not have been reliably detected by the project if they are expressed at a low level yet still have important biochemical functions.

Many plant species (especially agriculturally manipulated ones) [29] are known to have undergone large genome-wide changes through duplication of the whole genome. The rice and the wheat genomes, for example, can have 4-6 copies of whole genomes [29] (wheat) whereas animals typically only have 2 (diploidy). These duplicated genes may pose a problem for the de novo assembly of sequence fragments, because repeat sequences confuse the computer programs when trying to put the fragments together, and they can be difficult to track through evolution.

Comparison with the 1000 Genomes Project

Similarities

Just as the Beijing Genomics Institute in Shenzhen, China is one of the major genomics centers involved in the 1000 Genomes Project, the institute is the site of sequencing for the 1000 Plant Genomes Project.[31] Both projects are large-scale efforts to obtain detailed DNA sequence information to improve our understanding of the organisms, and both projects will utilize next-generation sequencing to facilitate a timely completion.

Differences

The goals of the two projects are significantly different. While the 1000 Genomes Project focuses on genetic variation in a single species, the 1000 Plant Genomes Project looks at the evolutionary relationships and genes of 1000 different plant species.

While the 1000 Genomes Project was estimated to cost up to $50 million USD,[6] the 1000 Plant Genomes Project was not as expensive; the difference in cost coming from the target sequence in the genomes.[1] Since the 1000 Plant Genomes Project only sequenced the transcriptome, whereas the human project sequenced as much of the genome as is decided feasible,[6] there is a much lower amount of sequencing effort needed in this more specific approach. While this means that there was less overall sequence output relative to the 1000 Genomes Project, the non-coding portions of the genomes excluded in the 1000 Plant Genomes Project were not as important to its goals like they are to the human project. So then the more focused approach of the 1000 Plant Genomes Project minimized cost while still achieving its goals.

Funding

The project was funded by Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures (merger of iCORE ), Genome Alberta, the University of Alberta, the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI), and Musea Ventures (a USA-based private investment firm).[32] To date, the project received $1.5 million CAD from the Alberta Government and another $0.5 million from Musea Ventures.[32] In January 2010, BGI announced that it would be contributing $100 million to large-scale sequencing projects of plants and animals (including the 1000 Plant Genomes Project, and then following on to the 10,000 Plant Genome Project[8]).[31]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Retrieved Feb. 25, 2010
  2. ↑ Matasci N, Hung LH, Yan Z, Carpenter EJ, Wickett NJ, Mirarab S, et al. (2014). "Data access for the 1,000 Plants (1KP) project". GigaScience. 3 (17): 17. doi:10.1186/2047-217X-3-17. PMC 4306014. PMID 25625010.
  3. ↑ One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative (October 2019). "One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants". Nature. 574 (7780): 679–685. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2. PMC 6872490. PMID 31645766.
  4. ↑ Wong, Gane Ka-Shu; Soltis, Douglas E.; Leebens-Mack, Jim; Wickett, Norman J.; Barker, Michael S.; de Peer, Yves Van; Graham, Sean W.; Melkonian, Michael (2016-05-04). "Sequencing and Analyzing the Transcriptomes of a Thousand Species Across the Tree of Life for Green Plants". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 71: 741–765. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041040. ISSN 1543-5008. PMID 31851546. S2CID 209416841.
  5. 1 2 Carpenter EJ, Matasci N, Ayyampalayam S, Wu S, Sun J, Yu J, et al. (October 2019). "Access to RNA-sequencing data from 1,173 plant species: The 1000 Plant transcriptomes initiative (1KP)". GigaScience. 8 (10). doi:10.1093/gigascience/giz126. PMC 6808545. PMID 31644802.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Hayden EC (January 2008). "International genome project launched". Nature. 451 (7177): 378–9. Bibcode:2008Natur.451R.378C. doi:10.1038/451378b. PMID 18216809. S2CID 205035320.
  7. ↑ "About IGSR and the 1000 Genomes Project". IGSR: The International Genome Sample Resource. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  8. 1 2 Cheng, Shifeng; Melkonian, Michael; Smith, Stephen A.; Brockington, Samuel; Archibald, John M.; Delaux, Pierre-Marc; Li, Fay-Wei; Melkonian, Barbara; Mavrodiev, Evgeny V.; Sun, Wenjing; Fu, Yuan (2018-03-01). "10KP: A phylodiverse genome sequencing plan". GigaScience. 7 (3): 1–9. doi:10.1093/gigascience/giy013. PMC 5869286. PMID 29618049.
  9. ↑ Lewin, Harris A.; Robinson, Gene E.; Kress, W. John; Baker, William J.; Coddington, Jonathan; Crandall, Keith A.; Durbin, Richard; Edwards, Scott V.; Forest, Félix; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Goldstein, Melissa M. (2018-04-24). "Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (17): 4325–4333. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.4325L. doi:10.1073/pnas.1720115115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5924910. PMID 29686065.
  10. ↑ Pitman NC, Jørgensen PM (November 2002). "Estimating the size of the world's threatened flora". Science. 298 (5595): 989. doi:10.1126/science.298.5595.989. PMID 12411696. S2CID 891010.
  11. ↑ "NCBI Taxonomy". NCBI. Retrieved 2012-04-11.
  12. ↑ Bremer K (1985). "Summary of Green Plant Phylogeny and Classification". Cladistics. 1 (4): 369–385. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00434.x. PMID 34965683. S2CID 84961691.
  13. ↑ Graham LE, Delwiche CF, Mishler BD (1991). "Phylogenetic connections between the'green algae'and the'bryophytes'". Advances in Bryology. 213–44 (3): 451–483. JSTOR 2399900.
  14. 1 2 Doyle JJ (January 1992). "Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy". Systematic Botany. 1 (1): 144–63. doi:10.2307/2419070. JSTOR 2419070.
  15. ↑ Li, Zheng; Barker, Michael S. (2020-02-01). "Inferring putative ancient whole-genome duplications in the 1000 Plants (1KP) initiative: access to gene family phylogenies and age distributions". GigaScience. 9 (2). doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa004. PMC 7011446. PMID 32043527.
  16. ↑ Augustus GD, Jayabalan M, Rajarathinam K, Ray AK, Seiler GJ (2002). "Potential hydrocarbon producing species of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India". Biomass and Bioenergy. 23 (3): 165–169. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00045-4.
  17. ↑ Ye X, Al-Babili S, Klöti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, Potrykus I (January 2000). "Engineering the provitamin A (beta-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm". Science. 287 (5451): 303–5. Bibcode:2000Sci...287..303Y. doi:10.1126/science.287.5451.303. PMID 10634784. S2CID 40258379.
  18. ↑ Taiz L, Zeiger E (2006). "Chapter 13: Secondary metabolites and plant defense". Plant physiology (4th ed.). Sinauer Associates. ISBN 978-0-87893-856-8.
  19. ↑ Klapoetke NC, Murata Y, Kim SS, Pulver SR, Birdsey-Benson A, Cho YK, Morimoto TK, Chuong AS, Carpenter EJ, Tian Z, Wang J, Xie Y, Yan Z, Zhang Y, Chow BY, Surek B, Melkonian M, Jayaraman V, Constantine-Paton M, Wong GK, Boyden ES (March 2014). "Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations". Nature Methods. 11 (3): 338–346. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2836. PMC 3943671. PMID 24509633.
  20. ↑ Wong GK, Soltis DE, Leebens-Mack J, Wickett NJ, Barker MS, Van de Peer Y, Graham SW, Melkonian M (April 2020). "Sequencing and Analyzing the Transcriptomes of a Thousand Species Across the Tree of Life for Green Plants". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 71: 741–765. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041040. PMID 31851546. S2CID 209416841.
  21. ↑ Sahel JA, Boulanger-Scemama E, Pagot C, Arleo A, Galluppi F, Martel JN, Esposti SD, Delaux A, de Saint Aubert JB, de Montleau C, Gutman E, Audo I, Duebel J, Picaud S, Dalkara D, Blouin L, Taiel M, Roska B (July 2021). "Partial recovery of visual function in a blind patient after optogenetic therapy". Nature Methods. 27 (7): 1223–1229. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01351-4. PMID 34031601. S2CID 235203605.
  22. 1 2 "Retrieved Feb. 25, 2010". Archived from the original on 2010-03-07. Retrieved 2010-03-03.
  23. ↑ "1kP Sample List Viewer". www.onekp.com. Retrieved 2020-04-10.
  24. 1 2 Johnson, Marc T. J.; Carpenter, Eric J.; Tian, Zhijian; Bruskiewich, Richard; Burris, Jason N.; Carrigan, Charlotte T.; Chase, Mark W.; Clarke, Neil D.; Covshoff, Sarah; dePamphilis, Claude W.; Edger, Patrick P. (2012-11-21). "Evaluating Methods for Isolating Total RNA and Predicting the Success of Sequencing Phylogenetically Diverse Plant Transcriptomes". PLOS ONE. 7 (11): e50226. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...750226J. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050226. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3504007. PMID 23185583.
  25. 1 2 Morgante M (April 2006). "Plant genome organisation and diversity: the year of the junk!". Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 17 (2): 168–73. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2006.03.001. PMID 16530402.
  26. 1 2 3 Morozova O, Hirst M, Marra MA (2009). "Applications of new sequencing technologies for transcriptome analysis". Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 10: 135–51. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-145957. PMID 19715439. S2CID 26713396.
  27. ↑ Xie, Yinlong; Wu, Gengxiong; Tang, Jingbo; Luo, Ruibang; Patterson, Jordan; Liu, Shanlin; Huang, Weihua; He, Guangzhu; Gu, Shengchang; Li, Shengkang; Zhou, Xin (2014-06-15). "SOAPdenovo-Trans: de novo transcriptome assembly with short RNA-Seq reads". Bioinformatics. 30 (12): 1660–1666. arXiv:1305.6760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu077. ISSN 1367-4803. PMID 24532719.
  28. ↑ T, Marc; J, Eric; Tian, Zhijian; Bruskiewich, Richard; N, Jason; T, Charlotte; W, Mark; D, Neil; Covshoff, Sarah; W, Claude; P, Patrick (15 August 2019). "RNA Isolation from Plant Tissue v1 (protocols.io.439gyr6)". doi:10.17504/protocols.io.439gyr6. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. 1 2 3 Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GK, Li S, Liu B, et al. (April 2002). "A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica)". Science. 296 (5565): 79–92. Bibcode:2002Sci...296...79Y. doi:10.1126/science.1068037. PMID 11935017. S2CID 208529258.
  30. 1 2 Bird CP, Stranger BE, Liu M, Thomas DJ, Ingle CE, Beazley C, et al. (2007). "Fast-evolving noncoding sequences in the human genome". Genome Biology. 8 (6): R118. doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r118. PMC 2394770. PMID 17578567.
  31. 1 2 "BGI Seeks Proposals to Sequence 1,000 Plant, Animal Genomes; Pledges $100M Toward Effort". GenomeWeb. 12 January 2010. Retrieved 25 February 2010.
  32. 1 2 "Alberta iCORE researcher leads international genome project". Government of Alberta. November 13, 2008. Archived from the original on 2012-09-25. Retrieved 2018-08-21.
  33. ↑ Weigel D, Mott R (2009). "The 1001 genomes project for Arabidopsis thaliana". Genome Biology. 10 (5): 107. doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-107. PMC 2718507. PMID 19519932.
  34. ↑ Genome 10K Community of Scientists (2009). "Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10,000 vertebrate species". The Journal of Heredity. 100 (6): 659–74. doi:10.1093/jhered/esp086. PMC 2877544. PMID 19892720.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.