Sodium:solute symporter family
Structure of Sodium/Sugar symporter with bound Galactose from vibrio parahaemolyticus.[1]
Identifiers
SymbolSSF
PfamPF00474
InterProIPR001734
PROSITEPDOC00429
TCDB2.A.21
OPM superfamily64
OPM protein3dh4
CDDcd10322
Available protein structures:
Pfam  structures / ECOD  
PDBRCSB PDB; PDBe; PDBj
PDBsumstructure summary
PDB3dh4

Members of the Solute:Sodium Symporter (SSS) Family (TC# 2.A.21) catalyze solute:Na+ symport. The SSS family is within the APC Superfamily.[2] The solutes transported may be sugars, amino acids, organo cations such as choline, nucleosides, inositols, vitamins, urea or anions, depending on the system. Members of the SSS family have been identified in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes. Almost all functionally well-characterized members normally catalyze solute uptake via Na+ symport.

Function

Sodium/substrate symport (or co-transport) is a widespread mechanism of solute transport across cytoplasmic membranes of pro- and eukaryotic cells. The energy stored in an inwardly directed electrochemical sodium gradient, the sodium-motive force (SMF) is used to drive solute accumulation against a concentration gradient. The SMF is generated by primary sodium pumps (e.g. sodium/potassium ATPases, sodium translocating respiratory chain complexes) or via the action of sodium/proton antiporters. Sodium/substrate transporters are grouped in different families based on sequence similarities.[3][4]

The human placental multivitamin symporter co-transports an anionic vitamin with two Na+. In the rabbit Na+:D-glucose co-transporter, SGLT1, the glucose translocation pathway probably involves TMSs 10-13, and the binding site for the inhibitor, phlorizin, involves loop 13 (residues 604-610). Cation binding in the N-terminal domain may induce transport-related conformational changes. A conserved tyrosine in the first transmembrane segment of solute:sodium symporters is involved in Na+-coupled substrate co-transport.[5] Mechanistic aspects of Na+ binding sites in LeuT-like fold symporters has been discussed in detail.[6][7]

Substrate affinity in humans

In the human homologue (hSGLT1), H+ can replace Na+, but the apparent affinity for glucose reduces 20x from 0.3 mM to 6 mM. The apparent affinity for H+ is 6 μM, 1000x higher than for Na+ (6 mM). The transport stoichiometry is 1 glucose to 2 Na+ or H+. If Asp204 is replaced by glutamate (D204E), the apparent affinity for H+ increases >20x with no change in apparent Na+ affinity. The D204N or D204C mutation promotes phlorizin-sensitive H+ currents that are 10x greater than Na+ currents, and the glucose:H+ stoichiometry is then as great as 1:145. The mutant system thus behaves as a glucose-gated H+ channel.[8]

Structure

Proteins of the SSS vary in size from about 400 residues to about 700 residues and probably possess thirteen to fifteen putative transmembrane helical spanners (TMSs). They generally share a core of 13 TMSs, but different members of the family have different numbers of TMSs. A 13 TMS topology with a periplasmic N-terminus and a cytoplasmic C-terminus has been experimentally determined for the proline:Na+ symporter, PutP, of E. coli.[9] Residues important for substrate and Na+ binding in PutP are found in TMSs 2, 7 and 9 as well as in adjacent loops.[10] A 14 TMS topology with periplasmic N- and C-termini has been established for the Vibrio parahaemolyticus SglT carrier. SglT transports sugar:Na with a 1:1 stoichiometry. However, MctP of Rhizobium leguminosarum may take up monocarboxylates via an H+ symport mechanism as a dependency on Na+ could not be demonstrated and uptake was strongly inhibited by 10 μM CCP.

Faham et al., (2008) reported the crystal structure of a member of the solute:sodium symporter (SSS) family, the Vibrio parahaemolyticus sodium:galactose symporter, vSGLT (2XQ2​, 3DH4​). The approximately 3.0 angstrom structure contains 14 transmembrane α-helices in an inward-facing conformation with a core structure of inverted repeats of 5 TM helices (TM2 to TM6 and TM7 to TM11). Galactose is bound in the center of the core, occluded from the outside solutions by hydrophobic residues. The architecture of the core is similar to that of the leucine transporter (LeuT) (TC# 2.A.22.4.2) from the NSS family. Modeling the outward-facing conformation based on the LeuT structure, in conjunction with biophysical data, provided insight into structural rearrangements for active transport.[11]

Some bacterial sensor kinases (e.g., 2.A.21.9.1) have N-terminal, 12 TMS, sensor domains that regulate the C-terminal kinase domains. The latter are homologous to the kinase domain of NtrB and other sensor kinases.[12] The N-terminal sensor domains are homologous, but distantly related to members of the SSS. The closest homologues are PutP of E. coli (2.A.21.2.1) and PanF of E. coli (2.A.21.1.1). Homologous regulatory domains are found in Agrobacterium, Mesorhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Vibrio cholerae and Bacillus species. While it is clear that these domains function as sensors, it is not known if they also transport the small molecules they sense.

Transport reaction

The generalized transport reaction usually catalyzed by the members of this family is:[7]

solute (out) + nNa+  (out) → solute (in) + nNa+  (in).

An ordered binding model of sodium/substrate transport suggests that sodium binds to the empty transporter first, thereby inducing a conformational alteration which increases the affinity of the transporter for the solute. The formation of the ternary complex induces another structural change that exposes sodium and substrate to the other site of the membrane. Substrate and sodium are released, and the empty transporter re-orientates in the membrane, allowing the cycle to start again.[10]

Subfamilies

Proteins belonging to the SSS family can be found in the Transporter Classification Database.

Human proteins containing this domain

AIT; SLC5A1; SLC5A10; SLC5A11; SLC5A12; SLC5A2; SLC5A3; SLC5A4; SLC5A5; SLC5A6; SLC5A7; SLC5A8; SLC5A9

See also

References

  1. ↑ Faham S, Watanabe A, Besserer GM, et al. (August 2008). "The crystal structure of a sodium galactose transporter reveals mechanistic insights into Na+/sugar symport". Science. 321 (5890): 810–4. Bibcode:2008Sci...321..810F. doi:10.1126/science.1160406. PMC 3654663. PMID 18599740.
  2. ↑ Wong, Foon H.; Chen, Jonathan S.; Reddy, Vamsee; Day, Jonathan L.; Shlykov, Maksim A.; Wakabayashi, Steven T.; Saier, Milton H. (2012-01-01). "The amino acid-polyamine-organocation superfamily". Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology. 22 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1159/000338542. ISSN 1660-2412. PMID 22627175.
  3. ↑ Reizer J, Reizer A, Saier Jr MH (1990). "The Na+/pantothenate symporter (PanF) of Escherichia coli is homologous to the Na+/proline symporter (PutP) of E. coli and the Na+/glucose symporters of mammals". Res. Microbiol. 141 (9): 1069–1072. doi:10.1016/0923-2508(90)90080-A. PMID 1965458.
  4. ↑ Reizer J, Reizer A, Saier Jr MH (1994). "A functional superfamily of sodium/solute symporters". Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1197 (2): 133–136. doi:10.1016/0304-4157(94)90003-5. PMID 8031825.
  5. ↑ Mazier, S; Quick, M; Shi, L (August 19, 2011). "Conserved tyrosine in the first transmembrane segment of solute:sodium symporters is involved in Na+-coupled substrate co-transport". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286 (33): 29347–55. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.263327. PMC 3190740. PMID 21705334.
  6. ↑ Perez, C; Ziegler, C (May 2013). "Mechanistic aspects of sodium-binding sites in LeuT-like fold symporters" (PDF). Biological Chemistry. 394 (5): 641–8. doi:10.1515/hsz-2012-0336. PMID 23362203. S2CID 207453523.
  7. 1 2 Saier, MH Jr. "2.A.21 The Solute:Sodium Symporter (SSS) Family". Transporter Classification Database. Saier Lab Bioinformatics Group and SDSC.
  8. ↑ Quick M, Loo DD, Wright EM (January 2001). "Neutralization of a conserved amino acid residue in the human Na+/glucose transporter (hSGLT1) generates a glucose-gated H+ channel". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276 (3): 1728–34. doi:10.1074/jbc.M005521200. PMID 11024018.
  9. ↑ Jung, H; Hilger, D; Raba, M (January 1, 2012). "The Na+/L-proline transporter PutP". Frontiers in Bioscience. 17 (2): 745–59. doi:10.2741/3955. PMID 22201772.
  10. 1 2 Jung, H (October 2, 2002). "The sodium/substrate symporter family: structural and functional features". FEBS. 529 (1): 73–7. doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03184-8. PMID 12354616. S2CID 29235609.
  11. ↑ Faham, S; Watanabe, A; Besserer, GM; Cascio, D; Specht, A; Hirayama, BA; Wright, EM; Abramson, J (August 8, 2008). "The crystal structure of a sodium galactose transporter reveals mechanistic insights into Na+/sugar symport". Science. 321 (5890): 810–4. Bibcode:2008Sci...321..810F. doi:10.1126/science.1160406. PMC 3654663. PMID 18599740.
  12. ↑ Pao, GM; Saier, MH Jr. (February 1995). "Response regulators of bacterial signal transduction systems: selective domain shuffling during evolution". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 40 (2): 136–54. Bibcode:1995JMolE..40..136P. doi:10.1007/bf00167109. PMID 7699720. S2CID 8349319.
This article incorporates text from the public domain Pfam and InterPro: IPR001734
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.