Proto-Turkic
Reconstruction ofTurkic languages
RegionProbably the eastern part of Central Asia,[1] possibly including regions of East Asia and western Siberia[1]
Erac.3000 – c.500 BCE[2][3]
Lower-order reconstructions

Proto-Turkic is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Turkic languages that was spoken by the Proto-Turks before their divergence into the various Turkic peoples. Proto-Turkic separated into Oghur (western) and Common Turkic (eastern) branches. Candidates for the proto-Turkic homeland range from western Central Asia to Manchuria,[4] with most scholars agreeing that it lay in the eastern part of the Central Asian steppe,[5] while one author has postulated that Proto-Turkic originated 2,500 years ago in East Asia.[6]

The oldest records of a Turkic language, the Old Turkic Orkhon inscriptions of the 7th century Göktürk khaganate, already shows characteristics of Eastern Common Turkic. For a long time, the reconstruction of Proto-Turkic relied on comparisons of Old Turkic with early sources of the Western Common Turkic branches, such as Oghuz and Kypchak, as well as the Western Oghur proper (Bulgar, Chuvash, Khazar). Because early attestation of these non-easternmost languages is much more sparse, reconstruction of Proto-Turkic still rests fundamentally on the easternmost Old Turkic of the Göktürks, however it now also includes a more comprehensive analysis of all written and spoken forms of the language.[7]

The Proto-Turkic language shows evidence of influence from several neighboring language groups, including Eastern Iranian, Tocharian, and Old Chinese.[8]

Phonology

Consonants

The consonant system had a two-way contrast of stop consonants (fortis vs. lenis), k, p, t vs. g, b, d. There was also an affricate consonant, ç; at least one sibilant s and sonorants m, n, ń, ŋ, r, l with a full series of nasal consonants. Some scholars additionally reconstruct the palatalized sounds ĺ and ŕ for the correspondence sets Oghuric /l/ ~ Common Turkic *š and Oghuric /r/ ~ Common Turkic *z. Most scholars, however, assume that these are the regular reflexes of Proto-Turkic *l and *r.[9] Oghuric is thus sometimes referred to as Lir-Turkic and Common Turkic as Shaz-Turkic.

A glottochronological reconstruction based on analysis of isoglosses and Sinicisms points to the timing of the r/z split at around 56 BCE–48 CE. As A. V. Dybo puts it, that may be associated with

the historical situation that can be seen in the history of the Huns' division onto the Northern and Southern [groups]: the first separation and withdrawal of the Northern Huns to the west has occurred, as was stated above, in 56 BC,... the second split of the (Eastern) Huns into the northern and southern groups happened in 48 AD.[10]

Dybo suggests that during that period, the Northern branch steadily migrated from Western Mongolia through Southern Xinjiang into the north's Dzungaria and then finally into Kazakhstan's Zhetysu until the 5th century.[10]

There was no fortis-lenis contrast in word-initial position: the initial stops were always *b, *t, *k, the affricate was always () and the sibilant was always *s. In addition, the nasals and the liquids did not occur in that position either.[11]

Bilabial Dental or
alveolar
Palatal Velar
Plosive and
affricate
fortis *p *t /t͡ʃ/ *k
lenis *b *d *g
Sibilant *s
Nasal *m *n //
Liquid lateral *l (*ĺ //)
rhotic *r (*ŕ //)
Semivowel *j

Like in many modern Turkic languages, the velars /k/, /g/, and possibly /ŋ/ seem to have had back and front allophones ([k] and [q], [g] and [ɢ], [ŋ] and [ɴ]) according to their environments, with the velar allophones occurring in words with front vowels, and uvular allophones occurring in words with back vowels. The lenis stops /b/, /d/ and /g/~/ɢ/ may have tended towards fricatives intervocalically.[12]

Vowels

Like most of its descendants, Proto-Turkic exhibited vowel harmony, distinguishing vowel qualities a, ï, o, u vs. ä, e, i, ö, ü, as well as two vowel quantities. Here, macrons represent long vowels. Some scholars (e.g. Gerhard Doerfer) additionally reconstruct a mid back unrounded based on cognate sets with Chuvash, Tuvan and Yakut ï corresponding to a in all other Turkic languages, although these correspondences can also be explained as deriving from *a which underwent subsequent sound changes in those three languages.[13][14] The phonemicity of the distinction between the two close unrounded vowels, i.e. front *i and back , is also rejected by some.[14]

front back
unroundedrounded unroundedrounded
high *i, *ī /i/ *ü, *ǖ /y/ *ï, *ï̄ /ɯ/ *u, *ū /u/
mid *e, *ē /e/ *ö, *ȫ /ø/~/œ/ (*ë, *ë̄ /ɤ/) *o, *ō /o/
low *ä, *ǟ /ɛ/ *a, *ā /a/

Morphology

Nouns

Plural of nouns are formed by the suffix *-lAr, however, the Chuvash plural -sem <-сем> seems to be a late replacement. Reconstructable possessive suffixes in Proto-Turkic includes 1sg *-m, 2sg *-ŋ, and 3sg *-(s)i, plurals of the possessors are formed by *-z in Common Turkic languages.

Verbs

The reconstructable suffixes for the verbs include:

  • Aorist: *-Vr
  • Past: *-dI
  • Negative suffix: *-mA
  • 1sg: *-m < *-män < *bän
  • 2sg: *-n < *sän
  • 3sg: *-∅ <
  • 1pl: *-mïz/*-bïz < *bïz
  • 2pl: *-sïz < *sïz

Proto-Turkic also involves derivation with grammatical voice suffixes, as in cooperative *körüš, middle *körün, passive *körül, and causative *körtkür.

Vocabulary

Pronouns

Proto-Turkic Turkish Azeri Turkmen Kazakh Chuvash Karakhanid Uzbek Uyghur Bashkir Kyrgyz Sakha (Yakut)
I *bë,[15][16] *bän-[17][18]ben, ban-mənmenmen, ma-e-pĕ, man-men, man-men menminmenmin
you *së,[15][19] *sän-sen, san-sənsensen, sa-, size-sĕ, san-sen, san-sen, siz sen, sizhinsen, sizen
he/she/it *an-, *o-lon-, oon-, oolon-, o-lun-, vălan-, olu uulalkini, ol[20]
we *bïŕbizbizbizbizpir-bizbiz bizbeðbizbihigi
you (plural) *sïŕsizsizsizsender, sizdersir-sizsizlar senler, siler, sizlerheðsiler, sizderehigi
they *o-lar[21]on-laronlarolarolarvĕsem, vĕsen-olarular ularularalarkiniler, ollor

Numbers

Proto-Turkic Oghur Turkic Common Turkic
Volga Bulgar Chuvash Karakhanid Turkish Azeri Turkmen Kazakh Uzbek Uyghur Bashkir Kyrgyz Sakha (Yakut)
1 *bï̄r بىر (bīr)pĕrbīrbirbirbirbirbir birberbirbiir
2 *ëkï اَكِ (eki)ikĕikkīikiikiikiekiikki ikkiikeekiikki
3 *üç وج (več)viśĕüčüçüçüçüşuch üchösüčüs
4 *dȫrt تُوات (tüvet)tăvatătȫrtdörtdörddörttörtto'rt törtdürttörttüört
5 *bë̄ĺ(k) بيال (byel)pilĕkbḗšbeşbeşbäşbesbesh beshbişbeşbies
6 *altı اَلطِ (altï)ultăaltï̄altıaltıaltyaltıolti altealtıaltıalta
7 *jëtï جىَاتِ (čyeti)śičĕyétīyediyeddiýedijetiyetti yettiyetejetisette
8 *säkïŕ ڛَكِڔ (sekir)sakărsekizsekizsəkkizsekizsegizsakkiz sekkizhigeðsegizаğıs
9 *tokuŕ طُخِڔ (tuxïr)tăhărtokūzdokuzdoqquzdokuztoğızto'qqiz toqquztuğıðtoguztoğus
10 *ōn وان (van)vunōnonononono'n onunonuon
20 *jëgïrmï جِيِرم (čiyirim)śirĕmyegirmīyirmiiyirmiýigrimijıyırmayigirma yigrimeyegermejıyırmasüürbe
30 *otuŕ وطر (vutur)văḍărottuzotuzotuzotuzotızo'ttiz ottuzutıðotuzotut
40 *kırk حرح (xïrïx)hĕrĕhkïrkkırkqırxkyrkqırıqqirq qiriqqırqkırk-
50 *ällïg اَلُّ (ellü)allăelligelliəlliellieliwellik ellikilleelüü-
60 *ältmıĺ -utmălaltmïšaltmışaltmışaltmyşalpısoltmish atmishaltmışaltımış-
70 *jëtmïĺ -śitmĕlyetmišyetmişyetmişýetmişjetpisyetmish etmishyetmeşjetimiş-
80 *säkïŕ ōn سكر وان (sekir van)sakărvunseksȫnseksensəksənsegsenseksensakson seksenhikhänseksenağıs uon
90 *tokuŕ ōn طوخر وان (toxïr van)tăhărvuntoksōndoksandoxsandogsantoqsanto'qson toqsantuqhantoksontoğus uon
100 *jǖŕ جُور (čǖr)śĕryǖzyüzyüzýüzjüzyuz yüzyöðjüzsüüs
1000 *bıŋ -pinmiŋbinminmüňmıñming mingmeñmiñmuñ

References

  1. 1 2 Robbeets & Savelyev 2017, p. 127.
  2. The Turkic Languages Lars Johanson, Éva Á. Csató · 2015
  3. The Turks in World History Carter V. Findley · 2005, p.17
  4. Yunusbayev, Bayazit; Metspalu, Mait; Metspalu, Ene; Valeev, Albert (21 April 2015). "The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia". PLOS Genetics. 11 (4): e1005068. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005068. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 4405460. PMID 25898006. "The origin and early dispersal history of the Turkic peoples is disputed, with candidates for their ancient homeland ranging from the Transcaspian steppe to Manchuria in Northeast Asia."
  5. Robbeets, Martine; Savelyev, Alexander (21 December 2017). Language Dispersal Beyond Farming. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 127. ISBN 978-90-272-6464-0. "It is generally agreed among historians and linguists that the starting point of the Turkic migrations was located in the eastern part of the Central Asian steppe (see, e.g., Golden 1992, Kljastornyj & Suktanov 2009; Menges 1995:55). Turkologists use various definitions for describing the Proto-Turkic homeland, but most indicate more or less the same region. While Janhunen (1996:26, 2015:293) locates the Proto-Turkic homeland fairly precisely in Eastern Mongolia, Rona-Tas (1998:88), in a rather general manner, places the last habitat of the Turkic speakers before the disintegration of the family "in west and central Siberia and in the region south of it." The latter localization overlaps in large part with that proposed by Tenisev et al. (2006), who associate the Proto-Turkic urheimat with the vast area stretching from the Ordos Desert in Inner Mongolia to the foothils of the Sayan-Altai mountains in Southern Siberia."
  6. Janhunen, Juha (2013). "Personal pronouns in Core Altaic". In Martine Irma Robbeets; Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Shared Grammaticalization: With special focus on the Transeurasian languages. John Benjamins. p. 223. ISBN 9789027205995.
  7. Róna-Tas 1998, pp. 69.
  8. Róna-Tas 1998, pp. 78.
  9. Róna-Tas 1998, pp. 71–72.
  10. 1 2 Dybo, A. V. (2007). Chronology of Turkic languages and linguistic contacts of early Turks (PDF) (in Russian). Moscow. p. 770. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-03-11.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  11. Róna-Tas 1998, p. 71.
  12. Johanson 1998, p. 97.
  13. Róna-Tas 1998, p. 70.
  14. 1 2 Johanson 1998, pp. 90–91.
  15. 1 2 Georg, Stefan (2004-12-22). "Review of Starostin, Dybo, Mudrak, Gruntov & Glumov (2003): Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages". Diachronica. 21 (2): 445–450. doi:10.1075/dia.21.2.12geo. ISSN 0176-4225.
  16. "Turkic etymology : Query result". starling.rinet.ru. Retrieved 2021-09-23.
  17. "Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/ben", Wiktionary, 2021-08-20, retrieved 2021-09-23
  18. "Proto-Turkic/Pronouns and numbers - Wikibooks, open books for an open world". en.wikibooks.org. Retrieved 2021-09-23.
  19. "Turkic etymology : Query result". starling.rinet.ru. Retrieved 2021-09-23.
  20. In Sakha (AKA Yakut), kini(ler) is used for animate referents whereas ol(lor) is used for inanimate referents. While the latter is cognate with other third person forms given here, the former descends from Proto-Turkic *gëntü, *këntü '(him/her)self' and is thus cognate, for example, with Turkish kendi.
  21. This pronoun are constructed by adding a plural suffix to *o-l "he/she/it". However, an Oghur language Chuvash uses a completely different plural suffix that lacks vowel harmony, -sem. According to Róna-Tas (1998), -sem is a late replacement to *-lAr.

Sources

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.