Peter Kevin Castel
Castel in 2014
Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Assumed office
August 5, 2017
Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
In office
September 22, 2003  August 5, 2017
Appointed byGeorge W. Bush
Preceded byLawrence M. McKenna
Succeeded byPhilip M. Halpern
Personal details
Born
Peter Kevin Castel

(1950-08-05) August 5, 1950
Jamaica, New York
RelativesSister - Patricia Skarulis
EducationSt. John's University (BS, JD)

Peter Kevin Castel (born August 5, 1950) is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Education and career

Born on August 5, 1950, in Jamaica, New York, Castel received a Bachelor of Science degree from St. John's University in 1972 and a Juris Doctor from St. John's University School of Law in 1975. He was a law clerk to Kevin Thomas Duffy of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York from 1975 to 1977. He was in private practice of law at Cahill Gordon & Reindel in New York City, New York, from 1977 to 2003.[1]

Federal judicial service

On March 5, 2003, Castel was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York vacated by Lawrence M. McKenna. Castel was confirmed by the United States Senate on September 17, 2003, and received his commission on September 22, 2003. He took senior status on August 5, 2017.

Notable cases

BMS Entertainment v. Christopher Bridges and Kanye West, 04-cv-2584: Castel presided over a 2006 copyright-infringement trial against Christopher "Ludacris" Bridges and Kanye West. Bridges and West prevailed over claims that the song "Stand Up" copied from the work of a group of New Jersey musicians.[2]

In re: Bank of America Corp. Securities Litigation, 09-md-2058: Castel presided over a securities-fraud class action arising out of Bank of America's acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. during the height of the 2008 financial crisis. In 2013, Castel approved the action's settlement for $2.43 billion.[3]

United States v. One Tyrannosaurus Bataar Skeleton, 13-cv-857: Castel presided over civil forfeiture proceedings relating to the return of a rare Tyrannosaurus Bataar skeleton to the nation of Mongolia.[4]

U.S. Bank National Association v. UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., 12 Civ. 7322: In 2016, Castel presided over a one-month trial of claims brought by investors who asserted that defective residential loans were packaged and sold as residential mortgage-backed securities.[5] After Castel issued a lengthy decision,[6] the parties settled the claims for $850 million.[7]

United States v. Tucker, 16-cr-91: Castel presided over the 2017 criminal trial of Scott Tucker, who was charged with fourteen counts related to his operation of a payday-lending business.  The jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts.  In 2018, Castel sentenced Tucker to a term of imprisonment of sixteen years and eight months.[8]

United States v. Hernandez, 15-cr-379: Castel presided over the 2019 drug trafficking trial of Juan Antonio Hernandez, a former Honduran congressman and the brother of the then-sitting president of Honduras. A jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts. In 2021, Castel sentenced Hernandez to a term of imprisonment of life plus thirty years.[9]

S.E.C. v. Telegram Group, Inc., 19 Civ. 9439: In a March 2020 decision,[10] Castel concluded that the Securities and Exchange Commission was likely to prove that a cryptocurrency issued by the Telegram company qualified as a security and was subject to federal registration requirements.[11] Telegram later agreed to pay $18.5 million in civil penalties.[12]

In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 21-md-3010: In 2021, Castel was assigned to preside over a group of civil actions alleging that Google's advertising auctions violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.[13]

Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 22-cv-1461 (PKC): In a June 2023 decision, Castel dismissed the personal injury case against the airline Avianca and issued a $5,000 fine to two lawyers representing the plaintiff, who had submitted fake precedents generated by ChatGPT in their briefs. He noted numerous inconsistencies in the opinion summaries, describing one of the cases' legal analysis as "gibberish".[14]

References

  1. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory: Alphabetical index. Martindale-Hubbell. 9 June 2017. ISBN 9781561603763 via Google Books.
  2. Billboard Staff (2006-06-02). "Kanye, Ludacris Prevail In Copyright Case". Billboard. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  3. "BofA pays $2.4 billion to settle claims over Merrill". Reuters. 2012-09-28. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  4. Williams, Paige (2013-01-21). "Bones of Contention". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  5. "U.S. judge cuts back $2 billion mortgage bond case against UBS". Reuters. 2016-09-06. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  6. "U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. UBS Real Estate Sec. Inc., 205 F. Supp. 3d 386 | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  7. "US Bank Settles With UBS For $850M In Put-Back Suit - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  8. Vockrodt, Steve (January 5, 2018). "Payday lender Scott Tucker gets 16 years, 8 months in prison for $2 billion ripoff scheme". The Kansas City Star. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  9. Anderson, Jon Lee (2021-11-05). "Is the President of Honduras a Narco-Trafficker?". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  10. "Securities and Exchange Commission v. Telegram Group Inc. et al, No. 1:2019cv09439 - Document 227 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  11. "SEC v. Telegram: A Groundbreaking Decision in Cryptocurrency Enforcement? | Insights | Greenberg Traurig LLP". www.gtlaw.com. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  12. "Telegram to pay $18.5 million, return investor money to settle SEC charges". Reuters. 26 June 2020.
  13. Hagey, Tripp Mickle and Keach (2022-01-14). "Google Misled Publishers and Advertisers, Unredacted Lawsuit Alleges". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  14. Brodkin, Jon (23 June 2023). "Lawyers have real bad day in court after citing fake cases made up by ChatGPT". Ars Technica.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.