Abū-l Ḥassan Muqātil ibn Sulaymān Al-Balkhī
Personal
Died150 H/767 CE
ReligionIslam
EraEarly Islam
DenominationAthari[1]
Main interest(s)Tafsir, Hadith
Notable work(s)Tafsīr Muqatil
OccupationScholar of Islam
Muslim leader
Influenced

Muqātil ibn Sulaymān (Arabic: أبو الحسن مقاتل بن سليمان البلخى, romanized: Abū al-Ḥassan Muqātil ibn Sulaymān al-Balkhī) (d. 767 C.E.) was an 8th-century storyteller of the Quran. He wrote one of the earliest, if not first, commentaries (Tafsir) of the Qur'an still available today.[6][7]

Biography

Muqatil were born in Balkh, there are no works that date his birth, but some have estimated his birth year to be around 80 H. His father named Sulayman, although several chroniclers has confused that his father were named Hayyan.α

He spent his early life in both Balkh and Marw. In Balkh, he was impacted by the religious diversity it had in the pre-Islamic era. He later migrated to Marw in order to get married.[8] During the caliphate of Marwan II, Muqatil was involved in the civil war between the Abbasids and Umayyads.[9] With the end of Umayyad rule he migrated to Iraq, settling in Basra and then moving to Baghdad. Due to possible Zaydi influence, he preferred the Abbasids to the previous Umayyad government, and some sources indicate that he would frequent the Abbasid court. Once, when visiting the Caliph al-Mansur, a fly sat on his face. Muqatil remarked that God had created the fly to humble the tyrants.[8]

He later returned to Basra where he died in 150 H (767 CE).[8][10]

Legacy

Anthropomorphic views ascribed to Muqatil b. Suleyman.

Muqatil is the author of a Tafsir (commentary) on the Qur'an that John Wansbrough considers the oldest surviving complete tafsir and discusses in some detail.[7] This work was still in manuscript when Wansbrough wrote but has since been published.[11]

Ash'arites allege that Muqatil's views stood in complete opposite to the views of the contemporary Mu'tazila, as his ideas related to physical aspects and likening God to human image and activity.[3] His views on divine anthropomorphism were notorious to later generations, but in spite of his “extreme” corporealism, he employed ta'wil in his tafsir even on verses on the attributes of Allah believed by many to show the contradiction in his thought.[12] However orthodox Athari scholarship as well as some of the Madhab Imams praise him and commend him on enjoining orthodoxy, perhaps hinting that the Ash’ari claims against him are a form of slander or smeer campaign against Atharis.

Muqatil Ibn Sulayman also strongly associated "commanding right" with furthering the monotheism that he taught,[13] but also with a pacifist approach.[14]

Views on Divine Attributes

He interpreted the divine attributes in a literal, sometimes anthropomorphic sense, affirming Wajh Allah (the divine countenance), as a literal face, Ayn Allah (the divine eye) as a literal eye, Yad Allah (the divine hand) as a literal hand. He stated that God sat on the throne - describing Istiwa as Istaqarra (settlement), although he states that he did this before creating the creation. Closer inspection of his Tafsir yields that he inclined towards orthodox interpretation of the Kursi (throne) and the right side of God (as well as the seeing of God which is seen as anthropomorphic by the Mu'tazila who thought God can only be seen if he is a Jism (body)).[8]

Other views reported from Muqatil is that he said that God spoke through his mouth to Moses and he reportedly narrated the following Hadith:[3]

During the end of the day someone calls, where is the friend of Allah? Then, the group of angels step forward to sit with Him on the throne until they touch His shoulder.[3]

Yet these views only come from his enemies, and it is unknown if he actually held these views.

More extreme views were allegedly held by him, including that God possessed bodily parts such as flesh, blood, hair, bones etc. Muslim scholars were so convinced of Muqatil's extreme anthropomorphism that they even came up with the term "Muqatiliyyah" to designate a sect which allegedly followed Muqatil in such views.[15] There is however no evidence from the Tafsir or the writings of Muqatil for such beliefs, they remain allegations against him from his opponents.

Al-Ash'ari (who was not yet born at the time of Muqatil) reports that Muqatil and Dawud al-Jawabiri, said that God is a body and possesses an image like a human being with flesh, blood, hair, bones and limbs such as hand, leg, head, and eyes, though he states that they said that with all of these he is completely unlike the creation, and that the creation does not resemble him, his writings do not show such beliefs.[16]

Clash with Jahm bin Safwan

There was an intense theological and political debate that took place in the mosque of Marw between Muqatil and Jahm bin Safwan (d. 128 H/ 746 CE), regarding the divine attributes and a dispute between two political figures that Muqatil and Jahm were affiliated with. Each of them ended up writing a book refuting the other, and Muqatil used his political links to get Jahm expelled from Balkh, having him sent to Termez. In 128 H, in a subsequent battle with Muqatil's sponsor, Jahm was killed.[8]

Reception

Scholars contemporary to him were the first to criticise him, and did so in three areas. Abu Hanifa (d. 150 H/ 767 CE) criticised his theology, Abdullah ibn Mubarak (d. 181 H/ 797 CE) criticised his methodology (particularly that he did not quote Hadith with chains of transmission), and the accusation of being a liar is attributed to Waki' ibn al-Jarrah (d. 197/ 812 CE).[17][18][19][δ]

Abu Hanifa in particular warned Abu Yusuf (d. 182/798) of two groups from Khorasan, the Jahmiyyah and the Muqatiliyyah.[20][21][17][22] Ibn Hajar in particular quotes the following from him: "Two disgusting opinions came to us from the east: Jahm the negator [of God’s attributes] and Muqatil the anthropomorphist."[23] Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali stated that the early scholars (as-salaf) rejected Muqatil's views after they became known after his debate with Jahm. Some early traditionalists are said to have gone too far, with Makki ibn Ibrahim (d. 215 H), the teacher of al-Bukhari, permitting the killing of Muqatil.[24][16] Some, such as Kharijah ibn Mus'ab (d. 168 H/ 785 CE), were so outraged that they said they would do the deed themselves if they could.[25][26][27]

Hadith

Muqatil was also rejected in Hadith, being accused of reporting Hadith from those he never met, and in one instance, reportedly asking a local ruler if he wanted him to forge a Hadith.[8][28]

Medieval hadith scholars such as Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ibn Abi Hatim has said that Hadith found in the works Muqatil are fabricated, while the chains, according to Ahmad, are nonexistent at all.[29]

Al-Bukhari (d. 256 H) rejected him saying he was nothing at all.[30][31][32]

The Muhaddith Ibn Hibban (d. 354 H), author of the Sahih, summarised the opinions of the early generations on Muqatil thus, "He relied on Jewish and Christian sources in his interpretation of the Qurʾān; he was also an anthropomorphist assimilating God to His creatures; and in addition he used to forge ḥadīths."[33][34][35][36][8]

Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi (d. 463 H) was the first to accuse him of being a story teller, and the historian Ibn Asakir (d. 571 H) was the first to be explicit about this.[15]

Meanwhile, al-Daraqutni (d. 385) also consider Muqatil as liar on his Hadith authorities.[37][38][39]

The traditionist and historian Ibn Sa'd (d. 230) in his complete biography of Muqatil says that Muqatil was "The one who had a tafsir, he related from al-Dahhak ibn Muzahim and Ata ibn Abi Rabah, students of Ibn Abbas. Some of the people of hadith were wary of his hadith and objected to them."[40][41] Ibn Sa'd describes him as one of the Fuqaha' and Hadith scholars in Khurasan and does not give him a date of death. There is however unanimous consensus that Muqatil was not a scholar of Hadith. He did not use the isnads (chains of narration) properly. Amidst the scholars of Islam, Muqatil's reputation is that of a storyteller.[42]

Another prominent Hadith scholars such as Yahya ibn Ma'in, Waki' ibn al-Jarrah and al-Nasa'i, along with modern contemporary Hadith expert al-Albani also criticize the authority of Muqatil narration being unreliable.[43]

Tafsir

Aside from theology and Hadith, Muslim scholars however were at times positive about his contributions to Tafsir (exegesis of the Qur'an). Ibn Hajar (d. 852 H) for instance, who repudiates him as a liar and anthropomorphist, nevertheless brings positive comments on his Tafsir and other scholars were known to do this. Early exegete al-Tabari (d. 310 H) even quoted his view on the mysterious letters in the Qur'an as numerical counts, but was reluctant to name Muqatil as his source, stating he was among those whose views were not to be trusted. This could suggest that Muqatil's reputation had become so tainted, that few were willing to be associated with him by al-Tabari's time.[44]

Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728 H) however rejects the theological criticisms of Muqatil, arguing that those who criticised him, took their material from his enemies, specifically al-Ash'ari was to blame for taking Maqalat from the works of the Mutazila. He also rejected the accusation of anthropomorphism for Muqatil, saying he could not find any traces of anything he would consider anthropomorphic[γ] in Muqatil's works, and therefore he could not be an anthropomorphist.[45][46] He quotes al-Shafi'i saying, "Whoever desires Tafsir, he is dependent on Muqatil. Whosoever wants Fiqh he is dependent on Abu Hanifa."[45][e] Dr. Abdulkader al-Housien a Syrian tafsir scholar said that his teacher Dr. Nureddin 'Itr the famous Hadith scholar said it’s falsely attributed to imam Shafii.[47]^e

Ibn Taymiyyah uses his citation to argue that whilst Muqatil was not from the people who transmitted Hadith, Muqatil should be considered to have breadth of knowledge, including in Tafsir and other areas, making an analogy with Abu Hanifa and his authority in Fiqh, despite, according to Ibn Taymiyyah, people disagreeing with some of his other views.[45]

Ibn Abi al-Izz (d. 731), a follower of Ibn Taymiyyah,[48] argued that al-Ash'ari's material originated from the Mu'tazila and/or must have been tampered with.[49][50]

Contemporary Saudi scholar Abdullah al-Ghunayman, author of the commentary on Ibn Taymiyyah's Al-Aqidah Al-Waasitiyyah, argues that he could not find anything he would consider anthropomorphic from Muqatil, arguing that to be reliable, ones views must be taken from one's own works, and not from the works of an opponent. Al-Ghunayman says "Mushabbih" has become a catch word to accuse one's opponents because of their different views.[46][50]

See also

Notes

^α This topic were written by al-Dhahabi in his book, Mizan al-Itidal, regarding the confusion of identity of father of Muqatil either Sulaiman or Hayyan.[43]
^β As discussed above - others such as Ibn ‛Abd al-Raḥmān al-Malṭī (d. 377/987) and Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728/1328), did not consider him to have been an anthropomorphist.[51]
^γ However one should note that both Ibn Mubarak and Wakee' were students of Abu Hanifa.[52]
^δ Ibn Taymiyyah himself was accused of anthropomorphism, and was put on trial, found guilty and imprisoned for this.[53]
^e This is slightly different from what al-Mizzi, Ibn Taymiyyah's contemporary, reports of al-Shafi'i: "Whoever wants to study tafsīr he has to rely on Muqātil; whoever wants to study ḥadīth he has to rely on Mālik; and whoever wants to study kalam he has to rely on Abū Ḥanīfa"[54]

References

  1. ↑ https://www.noor-book.com/en/ebook-مقاتل-بن-سليمان-تفسير-ج-1-pdf
  2. ↑ al-Dhahabi, M. Husein. "Israelitic Narratives in Exegesis and Tradition." The 4th Conference of the Academy of Islamic Research,(Cairo: Al-Azhar Academy of Islamic Research. 1968.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Much Hasan Darojat, Mohd Fauzi Hamat, and Wan Adli Wan Ramli. "Al-Baqillani’s Critique to Anthropomorphist’s Concept of The Attributes of God." (2016). pp. 6-7 "Another Anthropomorphist, Ibn al-Karram, also maintained his [referring to Muqatil bin Sulayman who was quoted above] theological belief relying on Christianity in terms of the concept of God"
  4. ↑ Mona Zaytoon. "سلف السلفية" [The Ancestors of Salafism]. almothaqaf.com (in Arabic). Almothaqaf Newspaper. Archived from the original on 12 Mar 2023. كما ترجم له الذهبي في "سير أعلام النبلاء" (ج7، ص201-202) "قال ابن المبارك: ما أحسن تفسيره لو كان ثقة! وقال وكيع: كان كذابًا. قال البخاري: مُقاتل لا شيء البتة. وقال الذهبي: أجمعوا على تركه"أهـ. بينما رآه ابن تيمية في "منهاج السنة" (ج1، ص56) يصلح للاعتضاد والمتابعة!
  5. ↑ Ibn Taymiyya (1986). Muhammad Rashad Salim (ed.). "Minhaj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah" (in Arabic). pp. 618–619. وأما مقاتل فالله أعلم بحقيقة حاله، والأشعري ينقل هذه المقالات من كتب المعتزلة، وفيهم انحراف على مقاتل بن سليمان، فلعلهم زادوا في النقل عنه، أو نقلوا عنه، أو نقلوا عن غير ثقة، وإلا فما أظنه يصل إلى هذا الحد. وقد قال الشافعي: من أراد التفسير فهو عيال على مقاتل، ومن أراد الفقه فهو عيال على أبي حنيفة. ومقاتل بن سليمان وإن لم يكن ممن يحتج به في الحديث -بخلاف مقاتل بن حيان فإنه ثقة- لكن لا ريب في علمه في التفسير وغيره واطلاعه
  6. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 71
  7. 1 2 John Wansbrough, "The Sectarian Milieu" 2006 (Original 1978).
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sirry, M., 2012. Muqātil b. Sulaymān and Anthropomorphism. Studia Islamica, 107 (1), pp. 38-64.
  9. ↑ Williams, John Alden, ed. (1985). The History of al-Ṭabarī, Volume XXVII: The ʿAbbāsid Revolution, A.D. 743–750/A.H. 126–132. SUNY Series in Near Eastern Studies. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-87395-884-4.
  10. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 1
  11. ↑ John Wansbrough, "Quranic Studies" 2005 (Original 1977) Page XII.
  12. ↑ Williams, Wesley (2002). "Aspects of the Creed of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal: A Study of Anthropomorphism in Early Islamic Discourse". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 34: 441–463.
  13. ↑ Gordon, Sarah. "Governing by the Hisba." Gender, Law, and Security (2019): 59.
  14. ↑ Achmad Tohe, opere citato, p. 10.
  15. 1 2 Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 12.
  16. 1 2 Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 33.
  17. 1 2 Ibn Ḥajar al-‛Asqalānī, Tahdhīb, 4/143-46
  18. ↑ al-Dhahabī, Mīzan, 6/505-7
  19. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. pp. 11, 20
  20. ↑ Ibn Ḥibbān, Majrūḥīn, 2/348-49
  21. ↑ al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī, Tārīkh, 15/514-15
  22. ↑ Jamal al-din al-Qasimi: Tarikh al-Jahmiyyah wa'l-Mu'tazilah (1st ed.. Cairo. 1331/1912-3). p. 7. Ghuribi, p. 22
  23. ↑ Ibn Ḥajar al-‛Asqalānī, Tahdhīb, 10/281
  24. ↑ Ibn Rajab al-Ḥanbalī, Bayān Faḍl ‛ilm al-Salaf ‛alā ‘Ilm al-Khalaf,ed. Muḥammad ibn Nāṣir al-‘Ajmī(Beirūt: Dār al-Bashā’ir al-Islāmiyyah, 2003), p.55
  25. ↑ Ibn Ḥibbān, Majrūḥīn, 2/349
  26. ↑ al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī, Tārīkh, 15/212
  27. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 17
  28. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. pp. 15-16
  29. ↑ Muhammad bin Ahmed bin Othman bin Qaymaz Al-Dhahabi (2009). Al-Bajawi, Ali Muhammad (ed.). ميزان الاعتدال [Mizan al-I'tidal (The Balance of Moderation in Criticism of narrator)] (in Arabic). Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Ma'rifa. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
  30. ↑ Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail. "Tarikh Al-Kabir." Vol 8. "Muqatil bin Sulaiman"
  31. ↑ Ibn al-Jawzī, Ḍu‛afā’,3/136-37.
  32. ↑ al-Dhahabī, Mīzan, 5/505-7.
  33. ↑ Ibn Ḥibbān, Majrūḥīn, 2/348-49.
  34. ↑ Ibn Khallikān, Wafayāt, 5/256-57.
  35. ↑ al-Mizzī, Tahdhīb, 28/450.
  36. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. pp. 13, 19-20
  37. ↑ al-Dāruquṭnī, Ḍu‛afā’, 371
  38. ↑ al-Dhahabī, Mīzān, 5/505-7.
  39. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 20
  40. ↑ Sa'd, Ibn. "Muhammad. Kitab al-tabaqat al-kabir." Vol. 7 "Muqatil bin Suleiman al-Balkhi"
  41. ↑ Aisha Bewley (trans) "The Men of Madina, volume 1" 1997 page 231
  42. ↑ Calder, Norman; Mojaddedi, Jawid; Rippin, Andrew (March 2004). Classical Islam: A Sourcebook of Religious Literature. ISBN 9781134551705.
  43. 1 2 Yazid bin Abdul Qadir Jawas (October 2004). "Kelemahan Hadits-Hadits Tentang Fadhilah Yaasiin / Weakness of the hadiths regarding Fadeela of Yaasiin". Almanhaj. Pustaka Abdullah. Retrieved 19 November 2023. Hadits ini diriwayatkan oleh at-Tirmidzi (no. 2887) dan ad-Darimi (II/456), dari jalan Humaid bin Abdurrahman, dari al-Hasan bin Shalih dari Harun Abu Muhammad dari Muqatil bin Hayyan (yang benar Muqatil bin Sulaiman) dari Qatadah dari Anas secara marfu'; 2. Muqatil bin Hayyan. Kata Ibnu Ma'in: "Dha'if." Kata Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal: "Aku tidak peduli kepada Muqatil bin Hayyan dan Muqatil bin Sulaiman." ; ...Imam Ibnu Abi Hatim berkata dalam kitabnya, al-'Ilal (II/55-56): "Aku pernah bertanya kepada ayahku tentang hadits ini. Jawabnya: 'Muqatil yang ada dalam sanad hadits ini adalah Muqatil bin Sulaiman, aku mendapati hadits ini di awal kitab yang disusun oleh Muqatil bin Sulaiman. Dan ini adalah hadits Batill, tidak ada asalnya.'"; ...Syaikh Muhammad Nashiruddin al-Albany berkata: "Apabila sudah jelas bahwa Muqatil yang dimaksud adalah Muqatil bin Sulaiman, sebagaimana yang sudah dinyatakan oleh Imam Abu Hatim dan diakui oleh Imam adz-Dzahabi, maka hadits ini Maudhu' (Palsu).
  44. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. pp. 31, 37
  45. 1 2 3 Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 41
  46. 1 2 Abd Allāh Mūḥammad al-Ghanīmān, Sharḥal-‛Aqīdah al-Wāsiṭiyyah(al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah), 12/8.
  47. ↑ Dr. Abdulkader al-Housien. ‘ظاهرة التطرف في التاريخ الإسلامي ندوة في جامعة قازان.' (2021). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-Gcb83L5bw&t=1800
  48. ↑ Shagaviev, Damir A., and Venera N. Khisamova. "Islamic theological literature of the Salafi sect in the modern Tatarstan." Journal of Sustainable Development 8.7 (2015): 83.
  49. ↑ Ṣadr al-Dīn ‘Alī ibn ‘Alī ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī al-‘Izz al-Ḥanafī, Sharḥal-Ṭaḥāwiyyahfī al-‘Aqīdah al-Salafiyyah,ed. Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir (Riyāḍ: Fahrasah Maktabat al-Malik Fahd al-Waṭaniyyah, 1997).
  50. 1 2 Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. p. 43
  51. ↑ Tohe, Achmad. Muqatil ibn Sulayman: A neglected figure in the early history of Qur'ānic commentary. Diss. Boston University, 2015. pp. 40-42
  52. ↑ Abasoomar, Muhammad; Abasoomar, Haroon (27 February 2018). "The Great Hanafi Muhaddithun". Hadith Answers. Retrieved 29 September 2020.
  53. ↑ Jackson, Sherman A. "Ibn Taymiyyah on trial in Damascus." Journal of Semitic Studies 39.1 (1994): 41-85.
  54. ↑ Mizzī, Tahdhīb al-kamāl, vol. 28, p. 436.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.