Mar Ishodad of Merv (Classical Syriac: ܡܵܪܼܝ ܝܼܫܘܿܥܕܵܕ ܡܲܪܘܼܙܵܝܵܐ‎, romanized: Māri Ishoʿdāḏ Maruzāyā; fl. AD 850) was a bishop of Hdatta during the Abbasid Caliphate (near current-day Mosul, Iraq) and prominent theologian of the Church of the East, best known for his Commentaries on the Syriac Bible.

Life

Very little is known of Ishoʿdad's life,[1] but a few details have survived in annotations to the list of patriarchs compiled by Mari ibn Suleiman and Amr ibn Matta.[2] His epithet "of Merv" may denote a birthplace, meaning that he was born in the city of Merv in Khorasan, but this inference remains conjectural: his relationship to Merv is not known with certainty.[3] A member of the Church of the East—historically, though inaccurately,[4] known as the Nestorian church—he became bishop of Hdatta,[5] a town close to the mouth of the Great Zab in modern Iraq, perhaps in 837 after Abraham II of Seleucia-Ctesiphon left the see to become Patriarch of the Church of the East.[3]

Ishodad was a candidate for the patriarchate of the Church of the East around 853 after Abraham's death.[5][6] At the time the patriarchate was subject to the Abbasid Caliphate, and after two failed attempts to select a new patriarch, a secretary of the reigning caliph al-Mutawakkil, Ibrahim ibn Nuh al-Anbari,[6] recommended Ishodad for the position. al-Mutawakkil, however, opted for the candidate of Vizier Bukhtishu, Theodosius of Seleucia-Ctesiphon, and Ishoʿdad remained at Hdatta in opposition to the new patriarch.[6] He died shortly afterwards.[5]

Commentaries

Ishodad is best known for his extensive Syriac exegesis of the Old and New Testaments,[7] the Commentaries. The Commentaries were widely influential in the Syriac world, not only in the Church of the East but also the miaphysite West Syriac Orthodox Church. The West Syriac author Jacob Bar-Salibi, for example, made use of Ishodad's work in his own commentaries on the Psalms.[8][9]

Contents

The subjects of Ishodad's commentaries are as follows:[10]

Characteristics

Ishodad's work largely followed the lines set by Theodore of Mopsuestia,[12] the pre-eminent biblical interpreter of the Church of the East. Jacques-Marie Vosté went as far as to argue that Ishodad's arguments themselves could constitute an important source for the reconstruction of Theodore's own views given the paucity of that writer's surviving corpus, though this argument has not been accepted by later scholars.[13] Nonetheless, Ishodad differed from Theodore in certain significant respects. Against Theodore, he accepted the canonicity of the Book of Job and the Song of Songs.[14] Moreover, he drew on a wide range of previous commentators beyond Theodore, including Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory Nazianzen, Basil of Caesarea, and John Chrysostom, and among Syriac authors Aba I, Ephrem the Syrian, Narsai, and Henana of Adiabene.[15]

Clemens Leonhard describes the Commentaries as having a "generally sober character". In line with the traditional view of the exegetical School of Antioch, Ishodad openly rejects allegorical interpretation, and focuses on historical and philosophical problems in the texts.[16] Paul S. Russell views Ishodad's work as displaying a "scholarly sensibility along the lines of modern biblical research" in its careful treatment of different editions of the scriptural texts.[17]

Ishodad is the earliest authority to identify the disciple Nathanael, mentioned in John, with Bartholomew, one of the Twelve listed in the Synoptics.[18]

Historical context

Ishodad wrote the Commentaries in a fraught context. Under al-Mutawakkil, the tolerance of the Abbasid Caliphate towards its Christian and Jewish subjects had begun to wane.[19] Meanwhile, the Church of the East remained divided over the exegetical innovations of Henana of Adiabene, who had drawn on Greek and West Syriac sources in contrast to the official interpretive tradition of Theodore.[20] Though the increasingly characteristic pessimism of the works of Ishodad's era is not evident in the Commentaries, their intended audience is limited to Christian scholars, reflecting a period in which the possibilities for interreligious dialogue were declining.[21]

Modern editions

The first modern edition of Ishodad's works was prepared by Gustav Diettrich, who published selections of Ishodad's commentaries on the Old Testament in 1902.[22] His New Testament commentaries were edited and translated into English in five volumes by Margaret Dunlop Gibson in 1911–16;[23] Ceslas Van den Eynde prepared a complete edition and translation into French of the Old Testament commentaries in 1950–81.[24]

Notes

a. ^ These are treated as a single book in Syriac tradition.[25]

References

  1. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 4.
  2. ↑ Leonhard 2001, pp. 4–5.
  3. 1 2 Leonhard 2001, p. 5.
  4. ↑ Guscin 2016, p. 156.
  5. 1 2 3 Vauchez, Dobson & Lapidge 2000, p. 739.
  6. 1 2 3 Leonhard 2001, p. 8.
  7. ↑ Greenberg 2002, p. 416.
  8. ↑ Van Rompay 2011.
  9. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 17.
  10. ↑ Van den Eynde 1950–81; Gibson 2011.
  11. ↑ Fitzgerald 2010, p. 341.
  12. ↑ Van Rompay 2011.
  13. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 23.
  14. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 12.
  15. ↑ Van Rompay 2011.
  16. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 24.
  17. ↑ Russell 2009, p. 60.
  18. ↑ Hill 1998, pp. 49–50.
  19. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 8.
  20. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 18.
  21. ↑ Leonhard 2001, pp. 9–10.
  22. ↑ Leonhard 2001, p. 11.
  23. ↑ Gibson 2011.
  24. ↑ Van den Eynde 1950–81.
  25. ↑ van Peursen 2011, p. 145.

Bibliography

  • Fitzgerald, John T. (2010). "Theodore of Mopsuestia on Paul's Letter to Philemon". In Tolmie, D. Francois (ed.). Philemon in Perspective: Interpreting a Pauline Letter. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 333–64.
  • Gibson, Margaret (17 February 2011). The Commentaries of Isho'dad of Merv, Bishop of Hadatha (c. 850 AD): In Syriac and English. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-01906-4. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
  • Greenberg, Gillian (9 January 2002). Biblical Hebrew, Biblical Texts: Essays in Memory of Michael P. Weitzman. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-84127-235-1. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
  • Guscin, Mark (2016). The Tradition of the Image of Edessa. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Hill, C. E. (1998). "The Identity of John's Nathanael". Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 20 (67): 45–61. doi:10.1177/0142064x9802006703. S2CID 170347938.
  • Leonhard, Clemens (2001). Ishodad of Merw's Exegesis of the Psalms 119 and 139–147: A Study of His Interpretation in the Light of the Syriac Translation of Theodore of Mopsuestia's Commentary. Louvain: Peeters.
  • van Peursen, Wido (2011). "Ben Sira in the Syriac Tradition". In Rey, Jean-Sébastien; Joosten, Jan (eds.). The Texts and Versions of the Book of Ben Sira: Transmission and Interpretation. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. pp. 143–66.
  • Russell, Paul S. (2009). "The Psalms and Psalm 29 among Syrian Christians". In Hardy, Lowell K. (ed.). Psalm 29 through Time and Tradition. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co. pp. 52–68.
  • Van den Eynde, Ceslas (1950–81). Commentaire d'Išo'dad de Merv sur l'Ancien Testament (in French). Louvain: Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium.
  • Van Rompay, Lucas (2011). "Ishoʿdad of Merv". In Brock, Sebastian P.; Kiraz, George A.; Van Rompay, Lucas (eds.). Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition. Gorgias Press. Retrieved 10 June 2019.
  • Vauchez, André; Dobson, Richard; Lapidge, Michael (2000). Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages. Cerf. ISBN 978-1-57958-282-1. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
Wikisource has original works by or about:
Ishodad of Merv
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.