| Discipline | Constitutional law |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | Richelle Gernan |
| Publication details | |
Former name(s) | Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly |
| History | 1973-present |
| Publisher | O'Brien Center for Scholarly Publications, University of California College of the Law, San Francisco (United States) |
| Frequency | Quarterly |
| Standard abbreviations | |
| Bluebook | Hastings Const. L.Q. |
| ISO 4 | Hastings Const. Law Q. |
| Indexing | |
| ISSN | 0094-5617 |
| LCCN | 74645519 |
| OCLC no. | 01606931 |
| Links | |
The UC Law Constitutional Quarterly is a quarterly law review covering constitutional law edited by students of the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco. While most articles focus on issues arising under the United States Constitution, the journal also covers topics concerning state and foreign constitutions. Established in 1973, it is the oldest law journal in the United States devoted exclusively to constitutional issues. It was titled the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly from its founding until 2023.
Notable articles
- David Shelledy, Autonomy, Debate, and Corporate Speech, 18 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 541 (1991).[1] Cited in the dissent authored by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor in Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
- Julie M. Spanbauer, The First Amendment Right to Petition Government for a Redress of Grievances: Cut from a Different Cloth, 21 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 15 (1993).[2] Cited by the American Civil Liberties Union and American Association for Justice in Amici Curiae briefs.
- Joseph R. Grodin, Rediscovering the State Constitutional Right to Happiness and Safety, 25 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 1 (1997).[3] Cited by the Supreme Courts of California, Iowa and New Mexico.
- Neal Kumar Katyal, The Promise and Precondition of Educational Autonomy, 31 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 1 (1997).[4] Cited by Howard University School of Law Civil Rights Clinic as Amicus Curiae.
- Jamila Jefferson-Jones, Airbnb and the Housing Segment of the Modern 'Sharing Economy': Are Short-Term Rental Restrictions an Unconstitutional Taking? 42 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 557 (2015).[5] Cited by the Supreme Court of New York.
References
- ↑ "Volumes 16-30". Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- ↑ "Volumes 16-30". Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- ↑ "Volumes 16-30". Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- ↑ "Volumes 31-current". Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- ↑ "Volumes 31-current". Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.