The Elias Bassalygo bound is a mathematical limit used in coding theory for error correction during data transmission or communications.
Definition
Let be a -ary code of length , i.e. a subset of .[1] Let be the rate of , the relative distance and
be the Hamming ball of radius centered at . Let be the volume of the Hamming ball of radius . It is obvious that the volume of a Hamming Ball is translation-invariant, i.e. indifferent to In particular,
With large enough , the rate and the relative distance satisfy the Elias-Bassalygo bound:
where
is the q-ary entropy function and
is a function related with Johnson bound.
Proof
To prove the Elias–Bassalygo bound, start with the following Lemma:
- Lemma. For and , there exists a Hamming ball of radius with at least
- codewords in it.
- Proof of Lemma. Randomly pick a received word and let be the Hamming ball centered at with radius . Since is (uniform) randomly selected the expected size of overlapped region is
- Since this is the expected value of the size, there must exist at least one such that
- otherwise the expectation must be smaller than this value.
Now we prove the Elias–Bassalygo bound. Define By Lemma, there exists a Hamming ball with codewords such that:
By the Johnson bound, we have . Thus,
The second inequality follows from lower bound on the volume of a Hamming ball:
Putting in and gives the second inequality.
Therefore we have
See also
References
- ↑ Each -ary block code of length is a subset of the strings of where the alphabet set has elements.
Bassalygo, L. A. (1965), "New upper bounds for error-correcting codes", Problems of Information Transmission, 1 (1): 32–35
Claude E. Shannon, Robert G. Gallager; Berlekamp, Elwyn R. (1967), "Lower bounds to error probability for coding on discrete memoryless channels. Part I.", Information and Control, 10: 65–103, doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(67)90052-6
Claude E. Shannon, Robert G. Gallager; Berlekamp, Elwyn R. (1967), "Lower bounds to error probability for coding on discrete memoryless channels. Part II.", Information and Control, 10: 522–552, doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(67)91200-4