Daphnia magna
Female Daphnia magna with a clutch of asexual eggs: The animal is about 4 mm long.
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Branchiopoda
Order: Anomopoda
Family: Daphniidae
Genus: Daphnia
Species:
D. magna
Binomial name
Daphnia magna
Straus, 1820 [1]

Daphnia magna is a small planktonic crustacean (adult length 1.5–5.0 mm) that belongs to the subclass Phyllopoda.

Description

Daphnia magna is a typical water flea of the genus Daphnia. The females reach up to 5 mm in size, the males about 2 mm, thus they are among the largest species in the genus.[2] The body is protected by a translucent carapace made of chitin, a transparent polysaccharide.[3] It has a ventral opening and five pairs of thoracic limbs, used to help the filtering process.[4] Spike rows run along the back of the carapace. The intestine is hook-shaped and has two digestive ceca. The head has two antennae and a large compound eye.[5][6]

Adult females can be distinguished from those of otherwise similar species such as D. pulex by the absence of a comb on the abdominal claw and the presence of two distinct combs on the abdomen. The males are smaller than the females and have larger first antennas, a diagnostic feature that distinguishes them from small females.

Abdomen with abdominal claw of a female: The two combs with a gap on the margin and the deeply nicked posterior margin are diagnostic of the species.
Adult male, highlighting the first antenna

Ecology

Daphnia magna is a key species in many lentic habitats. It can be found in lakes and shallow ponds rich in organic matter sediment.[6] Numerous natural predators are known and can lead to plastic phenotypic responses. In the presence of kairomones, Daphnia spp. develop conspicuous protective structures as an elongated spine and a large body size.[7] In response to temperature differences, D. magna has shown both phenotypic plasticity and the ability to genetically evolve to deal with the heat stress of warmer, urban pond waters. Populations of Daphnia have also developed increased resistance to local pesticides.[8] Another factor that affects both phenotypic and behavioural plasticity of D. magna is the salinity of its surroundings.[9]

Daphnia magna is an important primary consumer and prey of many planktivorous fishes.[10] Other invertebrate predators are the larvae of the phantom midge Chaoborus and hemipterans (Notonecta) and Triops. The large size of the adults protects them from predation from some planktivorous invertebrates.

Distribution and habitat

Daphnia magna is widespread in the Northern Hemisphere and in particular in the holarctic.[2] It can be found in fresh and brackish water bodies of different sizes, from lakes to ponds and ephemeral rock pools near the sea. D. magna tolerates higher levels of salinity (up to one-fifth the salinity of sea water) than most other species of the genus.[3]

Daphnia magna is mainly found in the pelagic zone of water bodies, as it feeds primarily on suspended particles in the water column (mainly algae, but also bacteria and detritus). Nevertheless, compared to other species of Daphnia, it is more often found in association with the substrate where it is able to exploit benthic food sources as periphyton[11] and sediment.[4]

The results of genetic research confirm the deep split between Eastern and Western mitochondrial haplotype super-clades of D. magna. A narrow contact zone has been found between these two super-clades in the eastern part of Western Siberia, with proven co-occurrence in a single lake in the Novosibirsk region. However, at present there is no evidence suggesting that the two mitochondrial super-clades represent cryptic species. Rather, they may be explained by secondary contact after expansion from different refugia. Interestingly, Central Siberia has previously been found to be an important contact zone also in other cladoceran species, and may thus be a crucial area for understanding the Eurasian phylogeography of freshwater invertebrates.[12]

Nutrition

The main feeding strategy of D. magna is the filtering of suspended particles.[4] A specialized filtering apparatus, formed by the thoracic appendices, generates a water current within the thoracic opening of the carapace, which permits the collection and the ingestion of unicellular algae, bacteria, and detritus. D. magna can also feed on periphyton[11] and detritus,[4] an ability that can offer a competitive advantage to this species over strictly pelagic filter feeders in some environments where suspended food sources might be temporally limited.

Reproduction

Female carrying an ephippium
Cyclic parthenogenesis

As most of the other species of the genus Daphnia, D. magna reproduces by cyclical parthenogenesis. This form of reproduction is characterised by the alternating production of asexual offspring (clonal reproduction) and at certain time sexual reproduction through haploid eggs that need to be fertilised.

The asexual eggs (up to few dozens per clutch) are diploid and usually develop into females, or in response to adverse environmental stimuli, into males.

Asexual eggs hatch in the female brood pouch 1 day after being laid and are released after 3 days. Juveniles go through four to about six moults before becoming mature over a period of 5–10 days. An adult female produces one clutch with up to 100 eggs every 3–4 days until her death. It can live over 3 months in the laboratory at 20 °C.[13]

Dead females with ephippia in a dried pond

In response to unfavourable environmental conditions (which could lead to the freezing or the drying up of the pond), the same female can produce haploid resting eggs (usually two at a time), which when fertilised by males, are wrapped within a protective shell called an ephippium. These resting eggs enter a phase of diapause and are able to resist long periods of adverse environmental conditions over a long period of time. Hatching is triggered in response to specific stimuli such as increasing photoperiod and temperatures. The hatchlings from resting eggs develop exclusively into females.

Some clones of D. magna that do not produce males reproduce by automictic parthenogenesis, in which two haploid cells produced by meiosis fuse to produce a female zygote without fertilisation. This tends to make the resulting daughters homozygous, which may be deleterious.[14]

Behavior

The name "water fleas" might come from the typical swimming behavior of Daphnia species which is reminiscent of a series of jumps. The movement of the big second antennae generates an upward movement of the whole animal followed by its sinking (hop and sink). Although less common than for other lake dwelling species, vertical and horizontal migration patterns of this species have been observed.[15]

Diel vertical migration (DVM)[15] consists in the daily movement of animals from the upper water layers, where they spend the night, to the deep and dark layers, where they spend the day. This behavior reduces exposure of diurnal visual predators (such as many fish) by finding refuge in the dark near the bottom and then feeding undisturbed during the night in the food-rich upper water layers.[3] The basis of this behaviour is phototactic behavior (movements of entire organisms to, or away from, a light source). In D. magna phototactic behavior has an innate component (genetic) and an inducible component (for example in the presence of fish kairomones).[7]

In Diel horizontal migration, D. magna finds refuge within submerged plant-beds near the shore during daytime and migrates to open waters during the night. Cases of reversed migration patterns are documented when the risk of visual predation during the day is higher at the bottom or in the littoral zones (for example in the presence of fish that hunt within submerged plant‑beds).[4][16]

Daphnia magna, as the smaller D. pulex, is able to switch to a feeding behavior, termed browsing behavior, when suspended food is scarce. This feeding strategy consists in the stirring up of sediment particles from the bottom with the use of the second antennae and by the subsequent filtration of the suspended particles.[4][16]

Parasitism

Daphnia magna has become a model system to study the evolution and ecology of host-parasite interaction.[3] Animals collected from natural habitats are frequently infected.[17] Many parasites that infect D. magna have been identified and studied (Table 1), D. magna shows parasite-induced behavioural characteristics that can differ among genotypes.[18]

Female infected with Hamiltosporidium magnivora
Female non-infected (left) and infected (right) by the bacteria Pasteuria ramosa
Table 1: Parasites of Daphnia magna[3]
Taxa Parasite Tissue or infection site Transmission
Bacteria Pasteuria ramosa Blood, extracellular Horizontal, from dead host
Spirobacillus cienkowskii Blood, extracellular Horizontal, from dead host
Fungi Metschnikowia bicuspidata Body cavity, extracellular Horizontal, from dead host
Microsporidia Hamiltosporidium tvärminnensis Intracellular Horizontal and vertical
H. magnivora Intracellular Vertical, Horizontal (?)
Glugoides intestinalis Gut wall, intracellular Horizontal, from living host
Ordospora colligata Gut wall, intracellular Horizontal, from living host
Amoeba Pansporella perplexa Gut wall, extracellular Horizontal, from living host
Chytrid fungus Caullerya mesnili Gut wall, intracellular Horizontal, from living host
Nematoda Echinuria uncinata Body cavity, extracellular Horizontal, to a second host
Cestoda Cysticercus mirabilis Body cavity, extracellular Horizontal, to a second host

Microbiota

Daphnia magna can be looked at as a complex ecosystem, colonized by a community of commensal, symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms[19][20] called microbiota. The close proximity of the microbiota to its host allows for a tight interaction, capable of influencing development,[21] disease resistance[22][23] and nutrition.[24] The absence of microbiota in D. magna has been shown to cause a slower growth, a decrease in fecundity and a higher mortality compared to D. magna with microbiota.[25] The gut microbiota changes upon death and its complexity is reduced and stabilized in case of starvation.[26]

Model organism

Daphnia magna presents numerous advantages when used as experimental organism. Its transparency allows for the observations of its inner anatomical structures at the microscope, while its reproduction through cyclical parthenogenesis allows to generate clones (asexual reproduction) or to perform crossing between strains (sexual reproduction). In the research field, D. magna is considered easy to keep in the laboratory. Some of its advantages for experiments are a fast generation time, limited storage usage, easy and cheap feeding and simple maintenance.

Daphnia magna is used in different field of research, such as ecotoxicology, population genetics, the evolution of sex, phenotypic plasticity, ecophysiology (including global change biology) and host-parasite interactions.[27]

Historically, D. magna allowed researchers to test some interesting theories and conduct pioneering studies:

Other recent experiments used the resting eggs of Daphnia present in a pond sediment to reconstruct the evolutionary history of that population in relation to one of its parasites (P. ramosa),[30] an example of resurrection biology.

In ecotoxicology D. magna is specified to be used in the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Tests No. 202 "Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test",[31] and Test No. 211 "Daphnia magna Reproduction Test".[32] Test No. 202 is a 48-hour acute toxicity study, where young Daphnia are exposed to varying concentrations of the substance under test and the EC50 determined. Other Daphnia species than D. magna may occasionally be used, but labs mostly use D. magna as standard. Test No. 211 is a 21-day chronic toxicity test, at the end of which, the total number of living offspring produced per parent animal alive at the end of the test is assessed, to determine the lowest observed effect concentration of the test substance.

References

  1. ↑ "Daphnia magna". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
  2. 1 2 "Cladocera: The Genus Daphnia (including Daphniopsis) (Anomopoda: Daphniidae). Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, Volume 21. By John A. H. Benzie". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 80 (4): 491. 2005-12-01. doi:10.1086/501297. ISSN 0033-5770.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Ebert, Dieter (2005-01-01). Ecology, Epidemiology, and Evolution of Parasitism in Daphnia. National Center for Biotechnology Information (US). ISBN 978-1932811063.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fryer, Geoffrey (1991-01-29). "Functional Morphology and the Adaptive Radiation of the Daphniidae (Branchiopoda: Anomopoda)". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 331 (1259): 1–99. doi:10.1098/rstb.1991.0001. ISSN 0962-8436.
  5. ↑ Streble, Heinz; Krauter, Dieter (2012-01-01). Das Leben im Wassertropfen: Mikroflora und Mikrofauna des Süßwassers. Ein Bestimmungsbuch (in German). Kosmos. ISBN 9783440126349.
  6. 1 2 Weber, Cornelius I., ed. (1993). Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms (4th ed.). Cincinnati: Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory (USEPA). ISBN 9781428904040.
  7. 1 2 Meester, Luc De (1993). "Genotype, Fish-Mediated Chemical, and Phototactic Behavior in Daphnia Magna". Ecology. 74 (5): 1467–1474. doi:10.2307/1940075. JSTOR 1940075.
  8. ↑ Bender, Eric (21 March 2022). "Urban evolution: How species adapt to survive in cities". Knowable Magazine. Annual Reviews. doi:10.1146/knowable-031822-1. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  9. ↑ de Sampaio Kalkuhl, Alice; Khudr, Mouhammad Shadi; Hager, Reinmar (2021-07-24). "Phenotypic and behavioural plasticity of Daphnia magna (Strauss) under salinity stress". Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5132850.
  10. ↑ Lampert, W. (2006). "Daphnia: Model herbivore, predator and prey". Polish Journal of Ecology. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
  11. 1 2 Siehoff, Silvana; Hammers-Wirtz, Monika; Strauss, Tido; Ratte, Hans Toni (2009-01-01). "Periphyton as alternative food source for the filter-feeding cladoceran Daphnia magna". Freshwater Biology. 54 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02087.x. ISSN 1365-2427.
  12. ↑ Bekker, Eugeniya I.; Karabanov, Dmitry P.; Galimov, Yan R.; Haag, Christoph R.; Neretina, Tatiana V.; Kotov, Alexey A. (2018-04-15). "Phylogeography of Daphnia magna Straus (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Northern Eurasia: Evidence for a deep longitudinal split between mitochondrial lineages". PLOS ONE. 13 (3): e0194045. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194045. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5854346. PMID 29543844.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  13. ↑ "Daphnia magna". cfb.unh.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-02.
  14. ↑ Svendsen, Nils; Reisser, Celine M. O.; Dukić, Marinela; Thuillier, Virginie; Ségard, Adeline; Liautard-Haag, Cathy; Fasel, Dominique; Hürlimann, Evelin; Lenormand, Thomas (2015-11-01). "Uncovering Cryptic Asexuality in Daphnia magna by RAD Sequencing". Genetics. 201 (3): 1143–1155. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.179879. PMC 4649641. PMID 26341660.
  15. 1 2 De Stasio, Bart T. J; Nibbelink, N.; Olsen, P. (1993). "Diel vertical migration and global climate change: a dynamic modeling approach to zooplankton behavior". Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. Archived from the original on 24 April 2016. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
  16. 1 2 Horton, P. A.; Rowan, M.; Webster, K. E.; Peters, R. H. (1979-01-01). "Browsing and grazing by cladoceran filter feeders". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 57 (1): 206–212. doi:10.1139/z79-019. ISSN 0008-4301.
  17. ↑ Stirnadel, Heide A.; Ebert, Dieter (1997). "Prevalence, Host Specificity and Impact on Host Fecundity of Microparasites and Epibionts in Three Sympatric Daphnia Species". Journal of Animal Ecology. 66 (2): 212–222. doi:10.2307/6023. JSTOR 6023.
  18. ↑ Little, T. J.; Chadwick, W.; Watt, K. (2008-03-01). "Parasite variation and the evolution of virulence in a Daphnia-microparasite system" (PDF). Parasitology. 135 (3): 303–308. doi:10.1017/S0031182007003939. PMID 18005474. S2CID 13378284.
  19. ↑ Lederberg, J; McCray, AT (2001). "'Ome Sweet 'Omics—a genealogical treasury of words". Scientist. 15: 8.
  20. ↑ The NIH HMP Working Group; Peterson, Jane; Garges, Susan; Giovanni, Maria; McInnes, Pamela; Wang, Lu; Schloss, Jeffery A.; Bonazzi, Vivien; McEwen, Jean E. (2009-12-01). "The NIH Human Microbiome Project". Genome Research. 19 (12): 2317–2323. doi:10.1101/gr.096651.109. ISSN 1088-9051. PMC 2792171. PMID 19819907.
  21. ↑ Bates, Jennifer M.; Mittge, Erika; Kuhlman, Julie; Baden, Katrina N.; Cheesman, Sarah E.; Guillemin, Karen (2006-09-15). "Distinct signals from the microbiota promote different aspects of zebrafish gut differentiation". Developmental Biology. 297 (2): 374–386. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.006. PMID 16781702.
  22. ↑ Macpherson, Andrew J.; Harris, Nicola L. (2004). "Opinion: Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system" (PDF). Nature Reviews Immunology. 4 (6): 478–485. doi:10.1038/nri1373. PMID 15173836. S2CID 7844611.
  23. ↑ Koch, Hauke; Schmid-Hempel, Paul (2011-11-29). "Socially transmitted gut microbiota protect bumble bees against an intestinal parasite". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (48): 19288–19292. doi:10.1073/pnas.1110474108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3228419. PMID 22084077.
  24. ↑ Dethlefsen, Les; McFall-Ngai, Margaret; Relman, David A. (2007). "An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human–microbe mutualism and disease". Nature. 449 (7164): 811–818. doi:10.1038/nature06245. PMC 9464033. PMID 17943117. S2CID 1106834.
  25. ↑ Sison-Mangus, M. P.; Mushegian, A. A.; Ebert, D. (2014). "Water fleas require microbiota for survival, growth and reproduction". The ISME Journal. 9 (1): 59–67. doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.116. PMC 4274426. PMID 25026374.
  26. ↑ Freese, Heike M.; Schink, Bernhard (2011-06-11). "Composition and Stability of the Microbial Community inside the Digestive Tract of the Aquatic Crustacean Daphnia magna". Microbial Ecology. 62 (4): 882–894. doi:10.1007/s00248-011-9886-8. ISSN 0095-3628. PMID 21667195. S2CID 7676851.
  27. ↑ Ebert, Dieter (2011-02-04). "A Genome for the Environment". Science. 331 (6017): 539–540. doi:10.1126/science.1202092. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 21292957. S2CID 206532030.
  28. ↑ Metchnikoff, Elie (1887). "Uber den Kampf der Zellen gegen Erysipelkokken. Ein Beitrag zur Phagocytenlehre". Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 107 (2): 209–249. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
  29. ↑ Naumann, Einar (1934-01-01). "Über die Anwendung von Daphnia magna Straus als Versuchstier zur experimentellen Klarlegung der Lebensverhältnisse im Wasser". Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie. 31 (1): 421–431. doi:10.1002/iroh.19340310126. ISSN 1522-2632.
  30. ↑ Decaestecker, Ellen; Gaba, Sabrina; Raeymaekers, Joost A. M.; Stoks, Robby; Kerckhoven, Liesbeth Van; Ebert, Dieter; Meester, Luc De (December 2007). "Host–parasite 'Red Queen' dynamics archived in pond sediment". Nature. 450 (7171): 870–873. doi:10.1038/nature06291. PMID 18004303. S2CID 4320335.
  31. ↑ "OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test". www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 2016-04-06.
  32. ↑ "OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, Test No. 211: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test". www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 2016-04-06.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.