Franjo Tuđman, first democratically elected and first president of modern independent Republic of Croatia

The independence of Croatia was a process started with the changes in the political system and the constitutional changes in 1990 that transformed the Socialist Republic of Croatia into the Republic of Croatia, which in turn proclaimed the Christmas Constitution, and held the 1991 Croatian independence referendum.

After the country formally declared independence in June 1991 and the dissolution of its association with Yugoslavia, it introduced a three-month moratorium on the decision when urged to do so by the European Community and the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. During that time the Croatian War of Independence started.

On 8 October 1991, the Croatian Parliament severed all remaining ties with Yugoslavia. The Badinter Arbitration Committee had to rule on the matter. Finally, Croatian independence was internationally recognized in January 1992, when both the European Economic Community and the United Nations granted Croatia diplomatic recognition, and the country was accepted into the United Nations shortly thereafter.

Background

During the World War II period from 1941 to 1945, Croatia was established as a puppet state called the Independent State of Croatia, governed by the ultranationalist, fascist Ustaše, backed by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy within the territory of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. From 1945 it became a Socialist federal unit of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, a one-party state run by the League of Communists of Croatia created at the end of World War II in Yugoslavia. Croatia enjoyed a degree of autonomy within the Yugoslav federation. At the turn of the 1970s, a Croatian national protest movement called the Croatian Spring was suppressed by Yugoslav leadership.[1] Still, the 1974 Yugoslav Constitution gave increased autonomy to federal units, essentially fulfilling a goal of the Croatian Spring and providing a legal basis for independence of the federative constituents.[2]

In the 1980s, the political situation in Yugoslavia deteriorated, with national tension fanned by the 1986 Serbian SANU Memorandum and the 1989 coups in Vojvodina, Kosovo and Montenegro.[3][4] As Slovenia and Croatia began to seek greater autonomy within the federation, including confederate status and even full independence, the nationalist ideas started to grow within the ranks of the still-ruling League of Communists. As Slobodan Milošević rose to power in Serbia, his speeches favored continuation of a unified Yugoslav state—one in which all power would be centralized in Belgrade.[5][6] In March 1989, the crisis in Yugoslavia deepened after the adoption of amendments to the Serbian constitution that allowed the Serbian republic's government to re-assert effective power over the autonomous provinces of Kosovo and Vojvodina. Up until that time, a number of political decisions were legislated from within these provinces, and they had a vote on the Yugoslav federal presidency level (six members from the republics and two members from the autonomous provinces).[7] In the Gazimestan speech, delivered on June 28, 1989, Milošević remarked on the current "battles and quarrels", saying that even though there were currently no armed battles, the possibility could not be excluded yet.[8] The general political situation grew more tense when in 1989 Vojislav Šešelj publicly consorted with Momčilo Đujić, a World War II Chetnik leader.[9] Years later, Croatian Serb leader Milan Babić testified that Momčilo Đujić had financially supported the Serbs in Croatia in the 1990s.[10] Conversely, Franjo Tuđman made international visits during the late 1980s to garner support from the Croatian diaspora for the Croatian national cause.[11]

Transition to democracy and political crisis

In mid-1989, political parties other than the Communist Party were first allowed, starting a transition from the one-party system. A number of new parties were founded in Croatia, including the Croatian Democratic Union (Croatian: Hrvatska demokratska zajednica) (HDZ), led by Franjo Tuđman.[12]

In January 1990, the Communist Party fragmented along national lines, with the Croatian faction demanding a looser federation. At the 14th Extraordinary Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, on 20 January 1990, the delegations of the republics could not agree on the main issues in the Yugoslav federation. The Croatian and Slovenian delegations demanded a looser federation, while the Serbian delegation, headed by Milošević, opposed this. As a result, the Slovenian and Croatian delegates left the Congress.[6][13][14] Having completed the anti-bureaucratic revolution in Vojvodina, Kosovo, and Montenegro, Serbia secured four out of eight federal presidency votes in 1991,[6] and it was able to heavily influence decision-making at the federal level, because unfavorable decisions could be blocked; this rendered the governing body ineffective. This situation led to objections from other republics and calls for reform of the Yugoslav Federation.[15]

In February 1990, Jovan Rašković founded the Serb Democratic Party (SDS) in Knin. Its program stated that the "regional division of Croatia is outdated" and that it "does not correspond with the interest of Serb people".[16] The party program endorsed redrawing regional and municipal lines to reflect the ethnic composition of the areas, and asserted the right of territories with a "special ethnic composition" to become autonomous. This echoed Milošević position that internal Yugoslav borders should be redrawn to permit all Serbs to live in a single country.[17] Prominent members of the SDS were Milan Babić and Milan Martić, both of whom later became high-ranking RSK officials. During his later trial, Babić would testify that there was a media campaign directed from Belgrade that portrayed the Serbs in Croatia as being threatened with genocide by the Croat majority and that he fell prey to this propaganda.[18] On 4 March 1990, a meeting of 50,000 Serbs was held at Petrova Gora. People at the rally shouted negative remarks aimed at Tuđman,[16] chanted "This is Serbia",[16] and expressed support for Milošević.[19][20]

Political moves and civil unrest

In late April and early May 1990, the first multi-party elections were held in Croatia, with Franjo Tuđman's win resulting in further nationalist tensions.[12]

A tense atmosphere prevailed in 1990: on May 13, 1990, a football game was held in Zagreb between Zagreb's Dinamo team and Belgrade's Crvena Zvezda team. The game erupted into violence between football fans and police.[21]

On May 30, 1990, the new Croatian Parliament held its first session. President Tuđman announced his manifesto for a new Constitution and a multitude of political, economic, and social changes, including a plan for Yugoslavia as a confederation of sovereign states.[22]

On July 25, 1990, Croatia made constitutional amendments that asserted and effected its sovereignty – the "Socialist" prefix was dropped from the country's name, the President of Croatia replaced the President of the Presidency, in addition to other changes.[23] The changes in the July 1990 Croatian Constitution did not relate to the status of the Serbs, which remained identical to the one granted by the 1974 Croatian Constitution (based on the 1974 Yugoslav Constitution).[24]

Nationalist Serbs in Croatia boycotted the Sabor and seized control of Serb-inhabited territory, setting up road blocks and voting for those areas to become autonomous. The Serb "autonomous oblasts" would soon become increasingly intent on achieving independence from Croatia.[25][26][27][28]

After HDZ came to power, they conducted a purge of Serbs employed in public administration, especially the police.[29] The Serbs of Croatia held a disproportionate number of official posts: in 1984, 22.6% of the members of the League of Communists of Croatia and 17.7% of appointed officials in Croatia were Serbs, including 28-31% in the Ministry of the Interior (the police).[30][31] Whereas, in 1981, they represented 11.5%[31] and in 1991, 12.2% of the total population of Croatia.[32] An even greater proportion of those posts had been held by Serbs in Croatia earlier on, which created a perception that the Serbs were guardians of the communist regime.[30]

President Tuđman made several clumsy remarks — such as the one from an April 16, 1990 speech[33] that he was 'glad that his wife is not a Serb'[34] that the Croatian historian Ante Nazor has described as something taken out of context.[33] All this was deliberately distorted by Milošević's media in order to artificially spark fear that any form of an independent Croatia is a new "ustashe state": in one instance, TV Belgrade showed Tuđman shaking hands with German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, accusing them of plotting to impose "a Fourth Reich".[35] The new Tuđman government was nationalistic and insensitive towards Serbs, but did not pose a threat to them before the war.[36]

The political crisis escalated when the Serb-populated areas attempted to form an enclave called Serbian Krajina which intended to separate from Croatia if Croatia itself attempted to separate from Yugoslavia. The Serb leadership in Krajina refused to recognize the government of the Republic of Croatia as having sovereignty over them. The crisis began in August 1990 with the Log Revolution as Croatian Serbs cut down trees and used them to block roads.[25][37] This hampered Croatian tourism and caused alarm in the province of Dalmatia as Croatia was hosting the 1990 European Athletics Championships in Split.[38]

On December 21, 1990, a new "Christmas Constitution" was passed, that adopted a liberal democracy.[39] The constitution defined Croatia as "the national state of the Croatian nation and a state of members of other nations and minorities who are its citizens: Serbs... who are guaranteed equality with citizens of Croatian nationality...."[40] The status of Serbs was changed from an explicitly mentioned nation (narod) to a nation listed together with minorities (narodi i manjine).[24] This constitutional change was also read by the majority of Serb politicians as taking away some of the rights that the Serbs had been granted by the previous Socialist constitution, and it fuelled extremism among the Serbs of Croatia.[41] This was not based on the literal reading of the former Constitution of SR Croatia, which had also treated solely Croats as a constitutive nation, saying Croatia was "national state" for Croats, "state" for Serbs and other minorities.[24]

On February 21, 1991, Croatia declared its Constitution and laws supreme to that of the SFRY,[42] and the Parliament enacted a formal resolution on the process of disassociation (Croatian: razdruženje) from SFR Yugoslavia and possible new association with other sovereign republics.[43]

Over two hundred armed incidents involving the rebel Serbs and Croatian police were reported between August 1990 and April 1991.[5][44]

Independence referendum and decisions

On May 19, 1991, the Croatian authorities held the Croatian referendum on independence.[45] Serb local authorities called for a boycott of the vote, which was largely followed by Croatian Serbs.[46] In the end, a majority of Croatians endorsed independence from Yugoslavia, with a turnout of 83.56% and the two referendum questions answered positively by 93.24% and 92.18% (resp.) of the total number of votes.[47]

On June 25, 1991, the country declared its independence from the SFRY, finalizing its effort to end its status as a constituent republic.[48][49][50] That decision of the parliament decision was partially boycotted by left-wing party deputies.[51]

The European Economic Community and the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe immediately urged both Croatia and Slovenia that they would not be recognized as independent states because of a fear of a civil war in Yugoslavia.[52] By mid-1991, the Croatian War of Independence had already started.[53] Serb-controlled areas of Croatia were part of the three "Serb Autonomous Oblasts" later known as the Republic of Serbian Krajina,[54] bulk of which would not be under Croatian control until 1995,[55][56] and the remaining parts in 1998.[57]

Croatia was first recognized as an independent state on 26 June 1991 by Slovenia, which declared its own independence on the same day as Croatia.[48] But by 29 June, the Croatian and Slovenian authorities agreed to a three-month moratorium on the independence declaration, in an effort to ease tensions.[58] The Brijuni Agreement was formally signed in a meeting of the European Community Ministerial Troika, the Yugoslav, Serbian, Slovenian and Croatian authorities on 7 July.[59] Lithuania was the sole state that recognized Croatia on 30 July.[60]

The Badinter Arbitration Committee was set up by the Council of Ministers of the European Economic Community (EEC) on 27 August 1991 to provide legal advice and criteria for recognition to former Yugoslav republics.[61] The five-member commission consisted of presidents of constitutional courts in the EEC.[62]

INA building in Šubićeva Street, Zagreb was selected for security reasons as the venue for parliament's declaration of independence on 8 October 1991

On 7 October, the eve of expiration of the moratorium, the Yugoslav Air Force attacked Banski dvori, the main government building in Zagreb.[63][64] On 8 October 1991, the moratorium expired, and the Croatian Parliament severed all remaining ties with Yugoslavia.[65] That particular session of the parliament was held in the INA building on Pavao Šubić Avenue in Zagreb due to security concerns provoked by recent Yugoslav air raid;[66] Specifically, it was feared that the Yugoslav Air Force might attack the parliament building.[67] This decision was reached unanimously in the Parliament, and the only parliamentary deputies missing were some from the Serb parties that had been absent since early 1991.[68]

General recognition

Germany advocated quick recognition of Croatia, in order to stop ongoing violence in Serb-inhabited areas, with Helmut Kohl requesting recognition in the Bundestag on 4 September. Kohl's position was opposed by France, the United Kingdom[69], and the Netherlands, but the countries agreed to pursue a common approach by following Germany's unilateral action. On 10 October, two days after the Croatian Parliament confirmed the declaration of independence, the EEC decided to postpone any decision to recognize Croatia for two months. German foreign minister Hans Dietrich Genscher later wrote that the EEC decided to recognize Croatian independence in two months if the war had not ended by then. With the war still ongoing when the deadline expired, Germany presented its decision to recognize Croatia as its policy and duty. Germany's position was supported by Italy and Denmark. France and the UK attempted to prevent German recognition by drafting a United Nations resolution requesting that no country take unilateral actions which could worsen the situation in Yugoslavia.[70]

Starting in late November 1991, the Badinter Commission rendered a series of ten opinions. The Commission stated, among other things, that Yugoslavia was in the process of dissolution, and that the internal boundaries of Yugoslav republics could not be altered unless freely agreed upon.[62] Factors in the preservation of Croatia's pre-war borders were the Yugoslav federal constitutional amendments of 1971 and 1974, granting that sovereign rights were exercised by the federal units, and that the federation had only the authority specifically transferred to it by the constitution.[2][71] The borders had been defined by demarcation commissions in 1947.[72]

Ultimately, France and the UK backed down during the Security Council debate on the matter on 14 December, when Germany appeared determined to defy the UN resolution. On 17 December, the EEC formally agreed to grant Croatia diplomatic recognition on 15 January 1992, on the basis of its request and a positive opinion of the Badinter Arbitration Commission.[70]

In its Opinion No. 5 on the specific matter of Croatian independence, the Commission ruled that Croatia's independence should not yet be recognized, because the new Croatian Constitution did not incorporate protections for minorities required by European Community. In response to this decision, the President of Croatia Franjo Tuđman wrote to Robert Badinter, giving assurances that this deficit would be remedied.[73]

Ukraine and Latvia were the first to react by recognizing Croatian independence in the second week of December.[60] The following week, Iceland and Germany recognized it, on 19 December 1991, as the first western European countries to do so.[60]

In response to the decisions of the Badinter Commission, the RSK formally declared its separation from Croatia on 19 December, but its statehood and independence were not recognized internationally.[74] On 26 December, Yugoslavia announced plans for a smaller state, which could include the territory captured from Croatia during the war.[75] This plan was rejected by the UN General Assembly.[76]

Three more countries decided to recognize Croatia before the EEC-scheduled date of January 15: Estonia, the Holy See, and San Marino.[60] The European Economic Community finally granted Croatia diplomatic recognition on 15 January 1992, and the United Nations did so in May 1992.[77][78]

Aftermath

In the period following the declaration of independence, the war escalated, with the sieges of Vukovar[79] and Dubrovnik,[80] and fighting elsewhere, until a ceasefire of 3 January 1992 led to stabilization and a significant reduction in violence.[81]

With the end of 1991, the second Yugoslavia effectively ceased to exist as a state, with the prime minister Ante Marković and the president of the presidency Stjepan Mesić resigning in December 1991,[82] and a caretaker government representing it until the country's formal dissolution in April 1992.[83]

The war effectively ended in August 1995 with a decisive victory for Croatia as a result of Operation Storm.[56] Croatia established its present-day borders when the remaining Serb-held areas of eastern Slavonia were restored to Croatia pursuant to the Erdut Agreement of November 1995, with the process concluded in January 1998.[57]

Legacy

Since 2002, 8 October is celebrated as Croatia's Independence Day, while 25 June is recognized as Statehood Day.[84][85] Previously, May 30, marking the day when the first democratic parliament was constituted in 1990, had been commemorated as Statehood Day.[86][87]

Although it is not a public holiday, 15 January is marked as the day Croatia won international recognition by Croatian media and politicians.[88] On the day's tenth anniversary in 2002, the Croatian National Bank minted a 25 kuna commemorative coin.[89]

Symbols

References

  1. Vlado Vurušić (6 August 2009). "Heroina Hrvatskog proljeća" [Heroine of the Croatian Spring]. Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 6 August 2012. Retrieved 14 October 2011.
  2. 1 2 Rich, Roland (1993). "Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union". European Journal of International Law. 4 (1): 36–65. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035834. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
  3. Frucht 2005, p. 433
  4. "Leaders of a Republic In Yugoslavia Resign". The New York Times. Reuters. 12 January 1989. Archived from the original on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 7 February 2010.
  5. 1 2 "Final report of the United Nations Commission of Experts established pursuant to security council resolution 780 (1992), Annex IV – The policy of ethnic cleansing; Prepared by: M. Cherif Bassiouni". United Nations. December 28, 1994. Archived from the original on May 4, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  6. 1 2 3 Brown & Karim (1995), p. 116
  7. "A Country Study: Yugoslavia (Former): Political Innovation and the 1974 Constitution (chapter 4)". The Library of Congress. Retrieved January 27, 2011.
  8. Tim Judah (July 1, 2001). "Tyrant's defeat marks Serbs' day of destiny". The Guardian. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
  9. "Vojislav Seselj indictment" (PDF). The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. January 15, 2003. Retrieved October 8, 2010.
  10. "Slobodan Milosevic Transcript, case NO. IT-94-1-T". December 4, 2002. Retrieved January 27, 2011.
  11. Ivica Radoš (December 9, 2009). "Tuđmana je za posjeta Americi 1987. trebao ubiti srpski vojni likvidator" [During his visit to America in 1987, Tuđman was supposed to have been killed by a Serbian military assassin]. Večernji list (in Croatian). Styria Media Group. Retrieved October 8, 2010.
  12. 1 2 Branka Magas (13 December 1999). "Obituary: Franjo Tudjman". The Independent. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  13. "Ivica Racan". The Times. April 30, 2007. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  14. Davor Pauković (1 June 2008). "Posljednji kongres Saveza komunista Jugoslavije: uzroci, tijek i posljedice raspada" [Last Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia: Causes, Consequences and Course of Dissolution] (PDF). Časopis za suvremenu povijest (in Croatian). Centar za politološka istraživanja. 1 (1): 21–33. ISSN 1847-2397. Retrieved 11 December 2010.
  15. Frucht (2005), p. 433
  16. 1 2 3 Goldstein (1999), p. 214
  17. Chuck Sudetic (August 5, 1991). "Serbs Refuse to Negotiate in Croatia". The New York Times. Retrieved January 24, 2011.
  18. Babić verdict, p. 9
  19. Ramet 2006, p. 382
  20. "Yugoslavia: Demonstrations in Croatia and Vojvodina". UNCHR. May 1, 1990. Archived from the original on March 24, 2012. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  21. "The Day When Maksimir Stadium Went up in Flames". Dalje.com. May 13, 2009. Archived from the original on August 20, 2012. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
  22. "Govor Franje Tuđmana u Saboru 30. svibnja 1990". Znameniti govori iz povijesti saborovanja (in Croatian). Croatian Parliament. Retrieved 2012-12-05.
  23. "Odluka o proglašenju Amandmana LXIV. do LXXV. na Ustav Socijalističke Republike Hrvatske". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (31/1990). July 25, 1990. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  24. 1 2 3 Bonacci Skenderović & Jareb 2004, pp. 737–739.
  25. 1 2 "Armed Serbs Guard Highways in Croatia During Referendum". The New York Times. 20 August 1990. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  26. Nohlen, Dieter; Stöver, Philip (2010). Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. p. 401. ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  27. Chuck Sudetic (2 October 1990). "Croatia's Serbs Declare Their Autonomy". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 November 2012. Retrieved 11 December 2010.
  28. Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Routledge. 1998. pp. 272–278. ISBN 978-1-85743-058-5. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  29. "Croatia in Yugoslavia, 1945–91". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  30. 1 2 Bjelajac, Žunec, Boduszynski, Draschtak, Graovac, Kent, Malli, Pavlović, Vuić (2009), p. 239
  31. 1 2 Roksandić, Drago (1991). Srbi u Hrvatskoj od 15. stoljeća do naših dana. Zagreb: Vjesnik. pp. 157–158. U razdoblju poslije 1981. godine, kada Srbi sačinjavaju 11,5 posto stanovništva, precizno 1984. godine, Vjeran Katunarić nalazi da su Srbi u Hrvatskoj 17,7 posto političkih rukovodilaca, 12,5 posto privrednih rukovodilaca, 11,9 posto pripadnika "sistemske inteligencije", [...]
  32. Milošević indictment, p. 29
  33. 1 2 Ante Nazor (2013-01-26). "Laž je da Tuđman 'izbacio' Srbe iz Ustava" [The lie is that Tuđman 'banned' Serbs from the Constitution] (in Croatian). Dnevno.hr. Archived from the original on 2014-10-27. Retrieved 2013-02-23.
  34. "World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Croatia: Overview". Minority Rights Group International. UNCHR. 2008. Retrieved June 29, 2012.
  35. Stephen Engelberg (September 1, 1991). "Carving out a Greater Serbia". New York Times. Retrieved June 29, 2012.
  36. Brown & Karim (1995), p. 119
  37. "Roads Sealed as Yugoslav Unrest Mounts". The New York Times. Reuters. 19 August 1990. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  38. Danko Plevnik (28 November 2009). "Vrdoljak je zahtijevao: Osvojite Knin s 2000 policajaca iz Splita" [Vrdoljak demanded: Seize Knin with 2000 policemen from Split]. Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  39. Sabor (22 December 1990). "Ustav Republike Hrvatske". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (56/1990). Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  40. Martić Verdict 2007, pp. 44–49.
  41. Pešić 1996, p. 1011[The nations'] rights to be “constitutive” were recognized not only within their respective states, but also among their conationals inhabiting the territory of other Yugoslav republics. In some cases, these ethnic diaspora communities viewed the constitutive nature of Yugoslav nationhood as giving them the right to extend the sovereignty of their national “homeland” to the territories they inhabited. Such was the case with Serbs in Croatia, constituting 12 percent of the republic’s population in 1991. Later, this status would produce enormous problems, giving Croatian Serbs the “right” to secede from Croatia, and giving Croatia the right to deny them this status by designating them as a “minority” in its new constitution.
  42. Croatian Parliament (February 21, 1991). "Ustavni zakon o dopunama Ustavnog zakona za provedbu Ustava Republike Hrvatske". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (8/1991). Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  43. Croatian Parliament (21 February 1991). "Rezolucija o prihvaćanju postupaka za razdruženje SFRJ i o mogućem udruživanju u savez suverenih republika". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (8/1991). Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  44. David C. Isby, "Yugoslavia 1991: Armed Forces in Conflict", Jane's Intelligence Review 394, 402 (September 1991)
  45. "Odluka o raspisu referenduma" [Decision to hold a referendum]. Narodne novine (in Croatian) (21/1991). 2 May 1991. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  46. Sudetic, Chuck (20 May 1991). "Croatia Votes for Sovereignty and Confederation". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  47. "Izviješće o provedenom referendumu" [Report on performed referendum] (PDF) (in Croatian). State Election Committee. 22 May 1991. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2012. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  48. 1 2 Chuck Sudetic (26 June 1991). "2 Yugoslav States Vote Independence To Press Demands". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  49. "Deklaracija o proglašenju suverene i samostalne Republike Hrvatske" [Declaration on proclamation of sovereign and independent Republic of Croatia]. Narodne novine (in Croatian) (31/1991). 25 June 1991. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  50. "Ustavna odluka Sabora Republike Hrvatske o suverenosti i samostalnosti Republike Hrvatske". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (31/1991). 1991-05-26. Retrieved 2011-06-25.
  51. "Šeks: Dio lijevoga bloka odbio glasovati za samostalnost". Novi list (in Croatian). HINA. 25 June 2012. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
  52. Riding, Alan (26 June 1991). "Europeans Warn on Yugoslav Split". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  53. Sudetic, Chuck (6 October 1991). "Shells Still Fall on Croatian Towns Despite Truce". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  54. "Croatia Clashes Rise; Mediators Pessimistic". The New York Times. 19 December 1991. Archived from the original on 15 November 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  55. Roger Cohen (2 May 1995). "CROATIA HITS AREA REBEL SERBS HOLD, CROSSING U.N. LINES". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  56. 1 2 Dean E. Murphy (8 August 1995). "Croats Declare Victory, End Blitz". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 December 2010.
  57. 1 2 Chris Hedges (16 January 1998). "An Ethnic Morass Is Returned to Croatia". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2010.
  58. Sudetic, Chuck (29 June 1991). "Conflict in Yugoslavia; 2 Yugoslav States Agree to Suspend Secession Process". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  59. "Brioni Declaration" (PDF). University of Uppsala Department of Peace and Conflict Research database. 8 July 1991. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  60. 1 2 3 4 "Date of Recognition and Establishment of Diplomatic Relation". Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration (Croatia). Retrieved 18 December 2011.
  61. Sandro Knezović (February 2007). "Europska politika u vrijeme disolucije jugoslavenske federacije" [European Politics at the Time of the Dissolution of the Yugoslav Federation] (PDF). Politička Misao (in Croatian). University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences. 43 (3): 109–131. ISSN 0032-3241. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  62. 1 2 Pellet, Allain (1992). "The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee: A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples" (PDF). European Journal of International Law. 3 (1): 178–185. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035802. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-05-29.
  63. "Yugoslav Planes Attack Croatian Presidential Palace". The New York Times. 8 October 1991. Retrieved 13 December 2010.
  64. Williams, Carol J. (8 October 1991). "Croatia Leader's Palace Attacked". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  65. Croatian Parliament (8 October 1991). "Odluka [Klasa: 021-03/91-05/07]". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (53/1991). Archived from the original on 23 September 2009. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  66. "Govor predsjednika Hrvatskog sabora Luke Bebića povodom Dana neovisnosti" [Speech of Luka Bebić, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament on occasion of the Independence day] (in Croatian). Sabor. 7 October 2008. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  67. Dražen Boroš (8 October 2011). "Dvadeset godina slobodne Hrvatske" [Twenty years of free Croatia] (in Croatian). Glas Slavonije. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  68. "Šeks: Odlukom od 8. listopada 1991. konačno utvrđena neovisnost" (in Croatian). Nova TV/Dnevnik.hr. 7 October 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
  69. Lukač, Morana (2013). Germany's Recognition of Croatia and Slovenia: Portrayal of the events in the British and the US press. Saarbrücken: AV Akademikerverlag. ISBN 978-3639468175
  70. 1 2 Lucarelli, Sonia (2000). Europe and the breakup of Yugoslavia: a political failure in search of a scholarly explanation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. 125–129. ISBN 978-90-411-1439-6. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  71. Čobanov, Saša; Rudolf, Davorin (2009). "Jugoslavija: unitarna država ili federacija povijesne težnje srpskoga i hrvatskog naroda – jedan od uzroka raspada Jugoslavije" [Yugoslavia: a unitary state or federation of historic efforts of Serbian and Croatian nations—one of the causes of the breakup of Yugoslavia]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu (in Croatian). University of Split Faculty of Law. 46 (2). ISSN 1847-0459. Retrieved 10 December 2010.
  72. Kraljević, Egon (November 2007). "Prilog za povijest uprave: Komisija za razgraničenje pri Predsjedništvu Vlade Narodne Republike Hrvatske 1945.-1946" [Contribution to the history of public administration: commission for the boundary demarcation at the government's presidency of the People's Republic of Croatia, 1945–1946] (PDF). Arhivski Vjesnik (in Croatian). Croatian State Archives. 50 (50): 121–130. ISSN 0570-9008. Retrieved 20 June 2012.
  73. Roland Rich (1993). "Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union" (PDF). European Journal of International Law. 4 (1): 48–49. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 21, 2012. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  74. Statehood and the law of self-determination. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2002. pp. 79–81. ISBN 978-90-411-1890-5. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  75. "Serb-Led Presidency Drafts Plan For New and Smaller Yugoslavia". The New York Times. 27 December 1991. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  76. "A/RES/49/43 The situation in the occupied territories of Croatia" (PDF). United Nations. 9 February 1995. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 May 2015. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  77. Stephen Kinzer (24 December 1991). "Slovenia and Croatia Get Bonn's Nod". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 June 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  78. Paul L. Montgomery (23 May 1992). "3 Ex-Yugoslav Republics Are Accepted Into U.N." The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  79. Sudetic, Chuck (18 November 1991). "Croats Concede Danube Town's Loss". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 December 2010.
  80. Binder, David (9 November 1991). "Old City Totters in Yugoslav Siege". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  81. Sudetic, Chuck (3 January 1992). "Yugoslav Factions Agree to U.N. Plan to Halt Civil War". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  82. Central and South-Eastern Europe 2003. Routledge. 2002. p. 174. ISBN 9781857431360. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  83. Stjepan Mesić (2004). The Demise of Yugoslavia: A Political Memoir. Central European University Press. p. 422. ISBN 9789639241817. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  84. "Zakon o izmjenama i dopuni Zakona o blagdanima, spomendanu i neradnim danima u Republici Hrvatskoj". Narodne novine (in Croatian) (96/2001). November 7, 2001. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  85. "Ceremonial session of the Croatian Parliament on the occasion of the Day of Independence of the Republic of Croatia". Official web site of the Croatian Parliament. Sabor. 7 October 2004. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  86. "Dan državnosti - Tri rođendana: Svaki datum ima povijesno značenje za Hrvatsku". Večernji list (in Croatian). 24 June 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2011.
  87. "Croatians celebrate Statehood Day". The Voice of Croatia. Retrieved 2019-10-08.
  88. "Obilježena obljetnica priznanja" [Recognition Anniversary Marked] (in Croatian). Croatian Radiotelevision. 15 January 2011. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  89. "Commemorative 25 Kuna Coins in Circulation". Croatian National Bank. 19 May 2010. Archived from the original on 16 December 2011. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  90. 20. lipanj 1990. - Prijedlog o promjeni imena i grba države [20 June 1990 - Proposal on the change of name and coat of arms of the state] (Motion picture, TV kalendar). Zagreb, Croatia: Croatian Radiotelevision. 2015-06-20.

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.