The Continental Center I and the KBR Tower, both part of the Cullen Center complex in Downtown Houston, have the corporate headquarters of Continental Airlines and KBR, respectively.[1][2][3]

Corporate headquarters is the part of a corporate structure that deals with tasks such as strategic planning, corporate communications, taxes, law, books of record, marketing, finance, human resources, and information technology.[4][5] Corporate headquarters takes responsibility for the overall success of the corporation and ensures corporate governance.[6] It is sometimes referred to as the head office, which is the location where the executives of a business work and where many of the key business decisions are made. Generally, corporate headquarters acts as a core when the business is operating.

The corporate headquarters includes: the CEO (chief executive officer) as a key person and their support staff such as the CEO office and other CEO related functions; the "corporate policy making" functions: Include all corporate functions necessary to steer the firm by defining and establishing corporate policies; the corporate services: Activities that combine or consolidate certain enterprise-wide needed support services, provided based on specialized knowledge, best practices, and technology to serve internal (and sometimes external) customers and business partners; the interface: Reporting line and bi-directional link between corporate headquarters and business units.[7] Most other divisions and branches report to the corporate headquarters and staff may visit there periodically for training or other instructions".[8] The corporate services are often relocated into a separate legal entity called shared services center.[9] Research shows that the city in which a company is headquartered has a significant influence on the company's activities, including its business practices and its corporate philanthropic giving.[6]

Locations of corporate headquarters

Corporate headquarters is considered a business's most prestigious location. A corporation's headquarters may also bring prestige to the city it is located in and help attract other businesses to the area. Businesses frequently locate their corporate headquarters in large cities, such as New York, because of the greater business opportunities available there.[10] The corporate headquarters may or may not be in the location in which the business is incorporated or where the majority of its employees work. Offices of a business that are not the corporate headquarters are called "branch offices".[11] The headquarters is often selected by the founders of the company to be conveniently located to where they live. Branch offices may then be opened, either locally, within the country or internationally. Companies, however, generally do not have two corporate headquarters, even if they are international companies, although they may have branches that take on some of the responsibility for making corporate decisions in other countries. For example, if a company is headquartered in New York but has an office in London, the company may assign a specific location in London to act as the London headquarters and to perform the tax function and legal compliance function within the United Kingdom.[12]

Roles of corporate headquarters

Public company functions

Most of the multi-business firms have their corporate headquarters performs obligatory functions. It represents all businesses legally in respect of the regulator(s) and aggregates the financial, tax, and legal data. Similarly, the corporate headquarters can also function as the company's face to the customer and build reputational value.[13]

Shared services

Shared services are services provided by the corporate headquarters for various business units. Owing to the aggregation of demand for these services, the headquarters can realize scale effects and provide them at lower total costs. Typical shared services are HR, IT, and marketing services.[14]

Value creation

In contrast to the first two roles, the "value creation role" of the corporate headquarters is more entrepreneurial in nature.[15] It is considered the major source of corporate advantages and key in justifying the configuration of diversified companies.[13] It comprises various horizontal and vertical coordination activities, such as the leveraging of the synergy potential and the application of management innovation.[16]

Control

The “control role" of the corporate headquarter guides the operations of the individual businesses toward the corporate goals. It can either focus on the financial outcome, or the operational behaviour, with both options implying very different approaches and requirements in terms of data and operations.[17]

Consequences brought by scaling corporate headquarters

Corporate headquarter change Potential advantages[18] Potential disadvantages[18]
Scaling corporate headquarter up
  • Increased coordination and synergy realization
  • Build up of corporate headquarters capabilities
  • Compliance with regulatory requirements
  • Additional overheads and costs
  • Bureaucracy and inappropriate interference
  • Value destruction
No change
  • Stability at the top: stable processes and networks
  • Low risk of organisational disruption
  • No additional costs
  • Misalignment between internal and external environment
  • Breeds impression of inactivity in the business units
Scaling corporate headquarter down
  • Reduction of overhead and cost savings
  • Reduction of bureaucracy and interference
  • Clarification of responsibilities
  • Restructuring costs
  • Deterioration of headquarters' capabilities
  • Harmful reduction in corporate capabilities and networks

See also

References

  1. "Headquarters Location Archived 2012-03-01 at the Wayback Machine." Continental Airlines. Retrieved on December 7, 2008.
  2. "Locations Archived 2009-01-08 at the Wayback Machine." KBR. Retrieved on August 7, 2009.
  3. Eriksen, Helen. "Will KBR ditch its Houston headquarters for Katy suburbia?." Houston Chronicle. April 30, 2008. Retrieved on January 13, 2009.
  4. M. Menz, S. Kunisch, D. Collis (2015): The Corporate Headquarters in the Contemporary Corporation. Academy of Management Annals 9(1): 633-714. [online] Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/7UTgqgrWfnB4GUDfZfJZ/full
  5. Wanner, Herbert (2006): "Global and regional corporate headquarters"; in: Kählin, Christian, H. (Editor): Switzerland Business & Investment Handbook; Orell Füssli and Wiley
  6. 1 2 Marquis, Christopher; Tilcsik, András (2016-10-01). "Institutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy". Organization Science. 27 (5): 1325–1341. doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1083. hdl:1813/44734. ISSN 1047-7039.
  7. Wanner, Herbert, LeClef Xavier, Shimizu, Hiroshi (2004): Global Headquarters on the Move: From Administrators to Facilitators. Prims Second Semester 2004; Arthur D. Little
  8. wiseGEEK, (2014). What Are Corporate Headquarters? (with picture). [online] Available at: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-corporate-headquarters.htm [Accessed 21 Oct. 2014].
  9. Wanner, Herbert, Quirina, Mireille J. (2004): DuPont, Philip Morris, Hewlett-Packard & Co – "Wohin mit der Konzernzentrale" (Whereto with the Corporate Headquarters)?; in: Odenthal, Stefan and Wissel, Gerhard (Hrsg): Strategische Investments in Unternehmen: Wie Sie Werte schöpfen, Kunden binden und Risiken managen; Gabler Verlag. ISBN 3-409-12313-X
  10. Marcousʹe, I. (2003). Business Studies. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  11. Carter, 1994
  12. Investopedia, (2009). "Corporate Headquarters Definition", Investopedia. [online] Available at: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporate-headquarters.asp [Accessed 20 Oct. 2014].
  13. 1 2 D. Collis, D. Young, M. Goold, "The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters," Strategic Management Journal 28(4): 383–405, 2007.
  14. M. Porter, "From competitive advantage to corporate strategy," Harvard Business Review 65: 43–59, 1987
  15. N.J. Foss, "On the rationales of corporate headquarters," Industrial and Corporate Change 6(2): 313–338, 1997.
  16. J.A. Martin, K.M. Eisenhardt, "Rewiring: Cross-Business-Unit Collaborations and Performance in Multi-Business Organizations," Academy of Management Journal 53(2): 265–301, 2010.
  17. K.M. Eisenhardt, "Control: Organizational and Economical ," Management Science 31(2): 134–149, 1985.
  18. 1 2 Kunisch, S., Schimmer, M. and Mueller-Stewens, G. (2012). A New Look for the Head Office: Corporate Headquarters Redesigns during Times of Crisis.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.