Birch's law, discovered by the geophysicist Francis Birch, establishes a linear relation between compressional wave velocity vp and density of rocks and minerals:
where is the mean atomic mass in formula units and is an empirical function determined by experiment.[1][2][3]
Example
The mean atomic mass of forsterite (Mg2SiO4) is equal to the sum of the atomic masses divided by the number of atoms in the formula:
Typical oxides and silicates in the mantle have values close to 20, while in the Earth's core it is close to 50.[3]
Applications
Birch's law applies to rocks that are under pressures of a few tens of gigapascals, enough for most cracks to close.[3] It can be used in the discussion of geophysical data. The law is used in forming compositional and mineralogical models of the mantle by using the change in the velocity of the seismic wave and its relationship with a change in density of the material the wave is moving in. Birch's law is used in determining chemical similarities in the mantle as well as the discontinuities of the transition zones. Birch's Law can also be employed in the calculation of an increase of velocity due to an increase in the density of material.[4]
Shortcomings
It had been previously assumed that the velocity-density relationship is constant. That is, that Birch's law will hold true in any case, but as you look deeper into the mantle, the relationship does not hold true deeper in the mantle for the increased pressures near the transition zone. In cases where Birch's law was applied beyond the transition zone, parts of the formula need to be revised. For higher pressure regimes, different laws may be needed to determine wave velocities.[2]
Determining Birch's law experimentally
The relationship between the density of a material and the velocity of a P wave moving through the material was noted when research was conducted on waves in different materials.
In the experiment, a pulse of voltage is applied to a circular plate of polarized barium titanate ceramic (the transducer) which is attached to the near end of the material sample. The added voltage creates vibrations in the sample. Those vibrations travel through the sample to a second transducer on the far end. The vibrations are then converted into an electrical wave which is viewed on an oscilloscope to determine the travel time. The velocity is the lender of the damper decided by the wave's travel time.
The resulting relationship between the density of the material and the discovered velocity is known as Birch's law.[1]
Velocity of compressional waves in rocks
The below table shows the velocities for different rocks ranging in pressure from 10 bars to 10,000 bars. It represents the how the change in density, as given in the second column, is related to the velocity of the P wave moving in the material. An increase in the density of the material leads to an increase in the velocity which can be determined using Birch's Law.
Velocities of Compressional Waves in Rocks[1] Rock Type Rock Location Rock Density Wave Velocity (in km/s)
at Pressure:10 bar 500 bar 2000 bar 10,000 bar Serpentinite Thetford,
Quebec2.601 5.6 — 5.73 6.00 Serpentinite Ludlow, VT 2.614 4.7 6.33 6.59 6.82 Granite, “G.I.” Westerly, RI 2.619 4.1 5.63 5.97 6.23 Granite Quincy, MA 2.621 5.1 6.04 6.20 6.45 Granite Rockport, MA 2.624 5.0 5.96 6.29 6.51 Granite Stone Mt., GA 2.625 3.7 5.42 6.16 6.40 Granite Chelmsford,
MA2.626 4.2 5.64 6.09 6.35 Gneiss Pelham, MA 2.643 3.4 5.67 6.06 6.31 Quartz monzonite Porterville,
CA2.644 5.1 — 6.07 6.37 Quartzite MT 2.647 5.6 — 6.15 6.35 Granite Hyderabad,
India2.654 5.4 6.26 6.38 6.56 Granite Barre, VT 2.655 5.1 5.86 6.15 6.39 Sandstone NY 2.659 3.9 5.0 5.44 5.85 Pyrophyllite
graniteSacred
Heart, MN2.662 5.9 — 6.28 6.45 Granite Barriefield,
Ontario2.672 5.7 6.21 6.35 6.51 Gneiss Hell Gate, NY 2.675 5.1 6.06 6.23 6.50 Granite Hyderabad,
India2.676 5.7 — 6.46 6.61 “Granite” Englehart,
Ontario2.679 6.1 6.28 6.37 6.57 Greywacke New Zealand 2.679 5.4 5.63 5.87 6.13 “Granite” Larchford,
Ontario2.683 5.7 6.13 6.25 6.41 Albite Sylmar, PA 2.687 6.40 — 6.65 6.76 Granodiorite Butte, MT 2.705 4.4 — 6.35 6.56 Graywacke Quebec 2.705 5.4 — 6.04 6.28 Serpentinite CA 2.710 5.8 — 6.08 6.31 Slate Medford, MA 2.734 5.49 — 5.91 6.22 “Charnockite” Pallavaram,
India2.740 6.15 — 6.30 6.46 Granodiorite
gneissNH 2.758 4.4 — 6.07 6.30 Tonalite Val Verde, CA 2.763 5.1 — 6.43 6.60 Anorthosite Tahawus, NY 2.768 6.73 — 6.90 7.02 Anorthosite Stillwater
Complex, MT2.770 6.5 — 7.01 7.10 Augite syenite Ontario 2.780 5.7 — 6.63 6.79 Mica schist Woodsville, VT 2.797 5.7 — 6.48 6.64 Serpentinite Ludlow, VT 2.798 6.4 — 6.57 6.84 Quartz diorite San Luis Rey
quad., CA2.798 5.1 — 6.52 6.71 Anorthosite Bushveld
Complex2.807 5.7 6.92 7.05 7.21 Chlorite schist Chester
Quarry, VT2.841 4.8 — 6.82 7.07 Quartz diorite Dedham, MA 2.906 5.5 — 6.53 6.71 Talc schist Chester, VT 2.914 4.9 — 6.50 6.97 Gabbro Mellen, WI 2.931 6.8 7.04 7.09 7.21 Diabase Centerville,
VA2.976 6.14 — 6.76 6.93 Diabase Holyoke, MA 2.977 6.25 6.40 6.47 6.63 Norite Pertoria,
Transvaal2.978 6.6 7.02 7.11 7.28 Dunite Webster, NC 2.980 6.0 — 6.46 6.79 Diabase Sudbury,
Ontario3.003 6.4 6.67 6.76 6.91 Diabase Frederick, MD 3.012 6.76 — 6.80 6.92 Gabbro French
Creek, PA3.054 5.8 6.74 7.02 7.23 Amphibolite Madison Co.,
MT3.120 6.89 — 7.12 7.35 Jadeite Japan 3.180 7.6 — 8.22 8.28 Actinoliter
schistChester, VT 3.194 6.61 — 7.20 7.54 Dunite Webster, NC 3.244 7.0 — 7.59 7.78 Pyroxenite Sonoma Co.,
CA3.247 6.8 — 7.79 8.01 Dunite Mt. Dun,
New Zealand3.258 7.5 7.69 7.80 8.00 Dunite Balsam
Gap, NC3.267 7.0 7.82 8.01 8.28 Bronzitite Stillwater
Complex, MT3.279 7.42 — 7.65 7.83 Dunite Addie, NC 3.304 7.70 — 8.05 8.28 Dunite Twin Sisters
Peaks, WA3.312 7.7 8.11 8.27 8.42 Eclogite Tanganyika 3.328 6.64 7.30 7.46 7.71 Jadeite Burma 3.331 8.45 — 8.69 8.78 Harzburgite Bushveld
Complex3.369 6.9 7.74 7.81 7.95 Eclogite Kimberley 3.376 7.17 7.65 7.73 7.87 Eclogite Sunnmore,
Norway3.376 5.2 — 7.30 7.69 Eclogite Healdsburg,
CA3.441 7.31 — 7.81 8.01 Garnet CT 3.561 6.3 — 8.55 8.99 Dunite Moonihoek
Mine,
Transvaal3.744 6.7 7.13 7.21 7.36
See also
References
- 1 2 3 Birch, Francis (April 1960). "The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars, Part 1". Journal of Geophysical Research. 65 (4): 1083–1102. Bibcode:1960JGR....65.1083B. doi:10.1029/JZ065i004p01083.
- 1 2 Birch, Francis (1961). "The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars, Part 2". Journal of Geophysical Research. 66 (7): 2199–2224. Bibcode:1961JGR....66.2199B. doi:10.1029/JZ066i007p02199.
- 1 2 3 Poirier, Jean-Paul (2000). Introduction to the physics of the earth's interior (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 79–80. ISBN 9780521663922 – via archive.org.
- ↑ Liebermann, Robert; Ringwood, A.E. (20 October 1973). "Birch's law and polymorphic phase transformations". Journal of Geophysical Research. 78 (29): 6926–6932. Bibcode:1973JGR....78.6926L. doi:10.1029/JB078i029p06926.