2002 Alabama gubernatorial election

November 5, 2002

Nominee Bob Riley Don Siegelman Party Republican Democratic Popular vote 672,225 669,105 Percentage 49.2% 49.0%

County results Congressional district results Riley:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70% Siegelman:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%

Governor before election Don Siegelman Democratic Elected Governor Bob Riley Republican

The 2002 Alabama gubernatorial election was held on November 5. The race pitted incumbent Democratic Governor Don Siegelman against Republican Bob Riley. As of 2023, this is the last time the Alabama Governor’s office changed partisan control.

The result was an extremely narrow victory for Riley. The certified results showed Riley with 672,225 votes to Siegelman's 669,105, a difference of 3,120 votes, or 0.23% of the 1,367,053 votes cast. The close and controversial election was marked by high turnout.

Primaries

Democratic primary results by county

  Siegelman

•   50–60%
•   60–70%
•   70–80%
•   80–90%

Republican primary results by county

  Riley

•   50–60%
•   60–70%
•   70–80%
•   80–90%
•   >90%

  James

•   40-50%

Elections in Alabama
Federal government Presidential elections 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 Presidential primaries Democratic 2000 2004 2008 2016 2020 2024 Republican 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 U.S. Senate elections 1819 1822 1822 sp 1826 sp 1828 1831 1834 1837 1837 sp 1840 1841 sp 1842 1847 1848 sp 1849 sp 1853 1855 1858 1868 1870 1872 1872 sp 1876 1878 1878 sp 1880 sp 1882 1884 1888 1890 1894 1896 1897 1900 1903 1907 1907 sp 1908 1911 1914 1914 sp 1918 1920 1920 sp 1924 1926 1930 1932 1936 1938 1938 sp 1942 1944 1946 sp 1948 1950 1954 1956 1960 1962 1966 1968 1972 1974 1978 1978 sp 1980 1984 1986 1990 1992 1996 1998 2002 2004 2008 2010 2014 2016 2017 sp 2020 2022 2026 2028 U.S. House of Representatives elections 1819 1821 1823 1825 1827 1829 1831 1833 1835 1837 1839 3rd sp 1841 1843 1845 3rd sp 1846 7th sp 1847 3rd sp 1849 1851 1853 1855 1857 1859 1868 1869 1870 1872 1874 1876 1878 1880 6th sp 1882 1883 1st sp 8th sp 1884 1886 1888 1890 1892 1894 3rd sp 1896 1898 1900 8th sp 1902 1904 5th sp 1906 1908 2nd sp 1910 1912 1914 3rd sp 8th sp 1916 1918 1919 7th sp 1920 5th sp 1921 4th sp 1922 1923 2nd sp 1924 1926 1928 3rd sp 5th sp 1930 1932 1933 8th sp 1934 1935 1st sp 1936 1938 2nd sp 1940 7th sp 1941 7th sp 1942 1943 3rd sp 1944 3rd sp 1946 1947 8th sp 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 3rd sp 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1989 3rd sp 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2013 1st sp 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
State government State elections 2004 2010 2014 2018 2020 2022 Gubernatorial elections 1819 1821 1823 1825 1827 1829 1831 1833 1835 1837 1839 1841 1843 1845 1847 1849 1851 1853 1855 1857 1859 1861 1863 1865 1868 1870 1872 1874 1876 1878 1880 1882 1884 1886 1888 1890 1892 1894 1896 1898 1900 1902 1906 1910 1914 1918 1922 1926 1930 1934 1938 1942 1946 1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 Lieutenant gubernatorial elections 2022 Attorney General elections 2018 2022 State Treasurer elections 2022 Senate elections 2010 2014 2018 2022 House of Representatives elections 2010 2014 2018 2022
Ballot measures 2000 Amendment 2 2006 Amendment 774 2020 Amendment 1
Birmingham Mayoral elections 2017 2021
Mobile Mayoral elections 2021
Montgomery Mayoral elections 2007 2009 sp 2011 2015 2019 2023
Government

Both of the principal contestants in the general election campaign faced primary-election opponents whose opposition turned out to be less than expected. The primaries were held on June 4, 2002.

Campaign

The closeness of the general election contest was reflected in its intensity and fervor. At one point in the campaign, a clash erupted between the two principal campaigns over disclosure of the identities of large contributors to the Riley campaign. President George W. Bush appeared in Alabama at a July event, and a private reception with a $50,000 admission was held to benefit the Riley campaign. Riley's campaign initially refused to identify the donors attending the event. Later, under pressure from the Siegelman campaign, Riley called on the national Republican Party, which had hosted the event, to release the names of donors.^[3] The Riley campaign was subjected to editorial criticism when the voluminous reports released made it difficult to trace the sources of donations from the event to Riley.^[4]

During the campaign, actor and National Rifle Association president Charlton Heston came to Alabama to campaign for Republican congressional candidates. While in the state, Heston released a written statement endorsing Siegelman, despite the fact that Riley had made a point of being seen in public with Heston. Spokesmen for both Riley and the Alabama Republican Party issued statements insinuating that Siegelman had taken advantage of Heston's recently diagnosed Alzheimer's disease to secure the endorsement. After a firestorm of criticism from the NRA and editorial pages, the Republican spokesmen apologized to Heston, but not to Siegelman.^[5]

Riley received the endorsements of The Birmingham News,^[6] the Mobile Press-Register, the Business Council of Alabama, and the Auburn University Trustee Improvement PAC, an alumni group which opposed Siegelman's choices for trustees at the school (Siegleman re-appointed controversial trustee Bobby Lowder, notorious for constant interference in the university's affairs).^[7] In addition to the NRA, Siegelman was endorsed by The Montgomery Advertiser, The Anniston Star, The Tuscaloosa News, and various labor groups, including the Alabama State Employees Association.^[8] Siegelman was also endorsed by Alabama Education Association executive secretary Paul Hubbert, although the Association itself remained officially neutral.^[9]

The campaign set new spending records for an Alabama gubernatorial race. Even before the final weeks of the campaign, the candidates had raised over $17,000,000. Riley, who raised and spent over twice the sum Siegelman raised, was primarily backed by business groups and insurance companies. Siegelman received substantial contributions from labor groups and affiliates of the Alabama Education Association. Both candidates were the beneficiaries of national party funding, and contributions from political action committees made donations to both candidates difficult to trace.^[10]

Polls taken in the final days of the campaign reflected the eventual close outcome.^[11]

Aftermath

Riley's victory was controversial, and caused many commentators to recall the Florida election recount of 2000.^[15][16] Initial returns showed Riley narrowly losing to Siegelman. Siegelman gave a victory speech on election night, and the Associated Press initially declared him the winner.^[17] However, officials in Baldwin County conducted a recount and retabulation of that county's votes after midnight, and after Democratic Party observers had gone home for the night.^[18] Approximately 6,000 votes initially credited to Siegelman were either removed from the total or reassigned to Riley in the recount, turning the statewide result in Riley's favor.^[19] Local Republican officials claimed the earlier returns were the result of a "computer glitch."^[20] Democratic requests to repeat the recount with Democratic observers present were rejected by Alabama courts and then-Attorney General Bill Pryor. Siegelman and his supporters complained that these judges (and Pryor) were either elected as Republicans or appointed by Republican presidents.^[21] After over a week of fights in courtrooms and in the media, Siegelman, on November 18, 2002, made a televised address, saying that, "I've decided that a prolonged election controversy would hurt Alabama, would hurt the very people that we worked so hard to help", and abandoned his efforts to secure a recount of the Baldwin County vote, allowing Riley to take office.^[22]

In response to the allegation of a "computer glitch", Siegelman later stated: "[N]ow one would expect that if there was some kind of computer glitch or some kind of computer programming error, that it might have affected more than one race, but it further raised suspicions about vote stealing when the votes came back and they were certified, and the only person who lost votes was Don Siegelman, the Democrat, and the only person who gained votes was Bob Riley, the Republican."^[23]

A number of analyses of the competing claims were undertaken at the time, with conflicting results. In one such study, Auburn University political scientist James H. Gundlach concluded that a detailed analysis of the returns, compared with 1998 results and returns from undisputed counties, "strongly suggests a systematic manipulation of the voting results."^[24] The Gundlach study also suggested a mechanism by which this could have been effected, and proposed a conclusion that Siegelman won. An earlier analysis reported by the Associated Press, using a less sophisticated comparison of gubernatorial and legislative returns, was claimed to indicate that the revised returns were more accurate, and that Riley probably won.^[25] The Gundlach paper offers a refutation of the conclusions of the Associated Press study.

Largely as a result of this controversy,^[26] the Alabama Legislature later amended the election code to provide for automatic, supervised recounts in close races.^[27] Riley took office January 20, 2003.

References

Note on references: Many of the sources cited above (as added in May 2008) are not available from free online sources. The Birmingham News, the Mobile Press-Register, The Montgomery Advertiser, and The Anniston Star have online archives on a fee basis. The Birmingham and Mobile newspaper archives may be accessed via www.al.com, while archives of The Anniston Star can be accessed at www.annistonstar.com. Archived articles of The Montgomery Advertiser may be purchased at www.montgomeryadvertiser.com Archived articles from all of these newspapers are also available to subscribers, or on a per-document fee basis, on Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis.

External links

• 2002 Election information at sos.state.al.us
• Certified election results at sos.state.al.us

See also